Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in bullous keratopathy: A 2-year analysis of graft survival and outcomes in a tertiary eye centre in Kuala Lumpur.

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to compare the 2-year graft survival and outcomes of descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK) for the treatment of bullous keratopathy (BK) among multiethnic Malaysia populations treated at a Tertiary Eye Centre in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study of BK or Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) patients who underwent DSEK or PK from 2015 to 2019 in Kuala Lumpur Hospital with a minimal post-operative follow-up of 2 years. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), graft survival and complications. A total of 26 DSEK cases and 32 PK cases were included.

RESULTS

At 2 years, graft survival rates were quite similar in two groups (DSEK 80.8% vs PK 75%, p=0.765). The mean follow-up period was 35.2 months in DSEK and 31.4 months for PK (p=0.465). The cumulative survival rates were slightly higher in the DSEK group (DSEK 73.1% vs PK 53.1%, p=0.119), but the result was not statistically significant. Postoperative complications were associated with higher graft failure in both groups (p=0.019). DSEK group has better post-operative BCVA (LogMAR DSEK 0.42 vs PK 0.83, p=0.003).

CONCLUSION

Similar graft survival rates were observed with both corneal transplant techniques for 2 years among Malaysian patients with BK. Post-operative complications can cause a higher risk of graft failure. DSEK produced better post-operative BCVA compared to PK.