Suppr超能文献

1 型糖尿病医疗保险优势计划受益人群中糖尿病技术使用的种族/民族差异。

Racial/Ethnic Inequities in Use of Diabetes Technologies Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries With Type 1 Diabetes.

机构信息

Medtronic Diabetes, Northridge, CA 91325, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jun 16;108(7):e388-e395. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad046.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Racial/ethnic inequities have been observed in diabetes care.

OBJECTIVE

To measure changes in prevalence of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and insulin pump therapy among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes by race/ethnicity and to determine the impact of socioeconomic factors on racial/ethnic inequities.

DESIGN

The prevalence of CGM and pump use was assessed by race/ethnicity for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries annually from 2017 through 2020. Models predicting technology use by year, race/ethnicity, age, sex, endocrinology visits, and measures of socioeconomic status were fit.

SETTING

Community.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Beneficiaries with type 1 diabetes and 2 or more claims with a diabetes diagnosis in the coverage year.

INTERVENTION(S): Insulin pump or CGM therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Use of diabetes technology by racial/ethnic group.

RESULTS

Technology use increased from 2017 through 2020 in all racial/ethnic groups. The absolute difference in use between White and Black beneficiaries from 2017 to 2020 remained stable for insulin pumps (10.7% to 10.8%) and increased for CGM (2.6% to 11.1%). The differences in pump use from 2017 to 2020 narrowed between White and Hispanic beneficiaries (12.3% to 11.4%) and White and Asian beneficiaries (9.7% to 6.6%), whereas the opposite occurred for CGM use (3.0% to 15.5% for White vs Hispanic beneficiaries; 1.5% to 8.0% for White vs Asian beneficiaries). Racial/ethnic inequities persisted (P < .0001) after adjusting for other characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in diabetes technology use between racial/ethnic groups often persisted from 2017 through 2020 and could not be explained by demographics, socioeconomic status, or endocrinology visits.

摘要

背景

在糖尿病护理中观察到了种族/民族不平等现象。

目的

通过种族/民族衡量医疗保险优势计划中 1 型糖尿病患者持续血糖监测(CGM)和胰岛素泵治疗的流行率变化,并确定社会经济因素对种族/民族不平等的影响。

设计

对医疗保险优势计划受益人每年的 CGM 和泵使用情况按种族/民族进行评估,时间为 2017 年至 2020 年。建立预测年度、种族/民族、年龄、性别、内分泌科就诊次数和社会经济地位衡量标准的技术使用模型。

地点

社区。

患者或其他参与者

有 2 次或以上糖尿病诊断索赔且患有 1 型糖尿病的患者。

干预措施

胰岛素泵或 CGM 治疗。

主要观察指标

按种族/族裔群体划分的糖尿病技术使用情况。

结果

所有种族/民族群体的技术使用率均从 2017 年上升到 2020 年。2017 年至 2020 年,白人和黑人受益人的胰岛素泵使用率差异保持稳定(10.7%至 10.8%),而 CGM 使用率差异则增加(2.6%至 11.1%)。2017 年至 2020 年,白人和西班牙裔受益人的胰岛素泵使用率差异缩小(12.3%至 11.4%),白人和亚裔受益人的胰岛素泵使用率差异也缩小(9.7%至 6.6%),而 CGM 使用率差异则相反(白人和西班牙裔受益人的差异为 3.0%至 15.5%;白人和亚裔受益人的差异为 1.5%至 8.0%)。调整其他特征后,种族/民族差异仍然存在(P<0.0001)。

结论

2017 年至 2020 年期间,不同种族/民族群体之间的糖尿病技术使用差异仍然存在,并且不能用人口统计学、社会经济地位或内分泌科就诊次数来解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验