• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jiang Song, Yu Dong, He Hongwei, Sun Haijian, Sun Yan, Zhou Longxiang, Wu Zhongxin, Gu Qiyun

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Jinshan Branch of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Apr;33(4):321-334. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0524. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1089/lap.2022.0524
PMID:36716177
Abstract

Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is considered a safe and feasible treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent studies. However, in elderly patients, application of LH still remains controversial, and the outcomes of LH versus open hepatectomy (OH) have not been fully evaluated. Our objective is to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of LH with OH in elderly patients with HCC. All studies comparing LH and OH in elderly patients with HCC were systematically searched in the databases of PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science. Statistical analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The last search was performed on March 20, 2022. Short-term outcomes include blood loss, operation time, blood transfusion, overall and major postoperative complications, mortality, hospital stay, tumor size, and surgical margin. Long-term outcomes include 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS); 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS); and 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). Fourteen studies involving 1596 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The short-term outcomes of LH were a shorter postoperative hospital stay and fewer overall and major postoperative complications (all  < .00001). However, there were no significant differences in operation time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, surgical margin, tumor size, and mortality. For the long-term outcomes, LH is comparable with OH in terms of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS; 1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS; and 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS. Compared with OH, LH is a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients with HCC.

摘要

近期研究表明,腹腔镜肝切除术(LH)被认为是治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的一种安全可行的方法。然而,在老年患者中,LH的应用仍存在争议,且LH与开腹肝切除术(OH)的疗效尚未得到充分评估。我们的目的是比较老年HCC患者LH与OH的短期和长期疗效。在PubMed、EmBase和Web of Science数据库中系统检索了所有比较老年HCC患者LH和OH的研究。使用Review Manager 5.3(Cochrane协作网,2014年)进行统计分析。最后一次检索于2022年3月20日进行。短期疗效包括失血量、手术时间、输血情况、总体及主要术后并发症、死亡率、住院时间、肿瘤大小和手术切缘。长期疗效包括1年、3年和5年总生存率(OS);1年、3年和5年无病生存率(DFS);以及1年、3年和5年无复发生存率(RFS)。本荟萃分析纳入了14项研究,共1596例患者。LH的短期疗效为术后住院时间较短,总体及主要术后并发症较少(均P<0.00001)。然而,手术时间、失血量、输血率、手术切缘、肿瘤大小和死亡率方面无显著差异。对于长期疗效,LH在1年、3年和5年OS;1年、3年和5年DFS;以及1年、3年和5年RFS方面与OH相当。与OH相比,LH是老年HCC患者的一种安全可行的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.老年肝细胞癌患者腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术的短期和长期结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2023 Apr;33(4):321-334. doi: 10.1089/lap.2022.0524. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hepatectomy in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌患者的短期和长期疗效:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):643-654. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0588. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
3
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients: Major findings based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者的腹腔镜肝切除术:基于系统评价和荟萃分析的主要发现
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11703. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011703.
4
Laparoscopic versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: A Single-Institutional Propensity Score Matching Comparison.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年肝细胞癌的单中心倾向评分匹配比较。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(6):495-504. doi: 10.1159/000510960. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
5
Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的近期和远期疗效:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(4):1203-15. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2705-8. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
6
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for malignant liver tumours in the elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗老年恶性肝肿瘤的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2021 Oct;73(5):1623-1641. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01091-7. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for large hepatocellular carcinoma: a single center propensity-score-matching comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗大肝癌:单中心倾向评分匹配的围手术期结局和长期生存的比较分析
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2997-3009. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09812-8. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
8
Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹肝切除术治疗肝细胞癌的长期疗效:病例匹配分析。
World J Surg. 2011 Oct;35(10):2268-74. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1212-6.
9
The efficacy and safety of totally laparoscopic hepatectomy for non-cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma in the elderly.老年非肝硬化肝细胞癌全腹腔镜肝切除术的疗效与安全性
BMC Surg. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0444-x.
10
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis of Case-Matched Studies.腹腔镜肝切除术与开腹手术治疗肝硬化肝细胞癌的疗效:病例匹配研究的Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 May 7;11:652272. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.652272. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing laparoscopic and open resection in elderly hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年肝细胞癌腹腔镜与开放切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Jun 30;15(3):1153-1164. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-67. Epub 2024 Jun 13.