Queiroz Marcello Moro, Sacardo Karina Perez, Ribeiro Mauricio Fernando, Gadotti Luiza Lara, Saddi Rodrigo, Oliveira Leandro Jonata de Carvalho, Linck Rudinei Diogo Marques, Cruz Marcelo Rocha de Souza, Barroso-Sousa Romualdo, Sahade Marina, Correa Tatiana Strava, Mano Max Senna, Suzuki Daniele Assad, Shimada Andrea Kazumi, Katz Artur
Oncology Center, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Street Dona Adma Jafet, number 115, zip-code 01308-050, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Oncology Center, DASA, Av. das Nações Unidas, number 7815, zip-code 05425-070, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2023;35:100683. doi: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100683. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have been recently developed and introduced into clinical practice.
We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with confirmed HR+/HER2 metastatic breast cancer treated with hormonal therapy in combination with ribociclib (R), palbociclib (P), or abemaciclib (A).
median progression-free survival (mPFS), time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), and objective response rate (ORR).
Between January 2016 - June 2021, 142 patients were treated with an CDK4/6i (79 P, 42 R, 21 A). The median age was 59 years and 67.6% had recurrent disease. Roughly 35.2%, 36.6%, 28.2% of the patients had 1, 2 or 3+ metastatic sites, respectively, and 55.6% of the patients received CDK4/6i as a first-line treatment. The mPFS was 28m(R) vs. 14m(P) vs. 6m(A) (P = 0.002), with a higher proportion of patients receiving R in the first-line setting. However, no difference was seen when the analysis was restricted to the first-line scenario (P = 0.193). Sixty-four patients required one dose reduction, and 19 patients required two. ORR was 76.2% (R) vs 62% (P) vs 42.9% (A). More patients achieved a complete response with R and P, with no difference in the incidence of partial response and stable disease. Adverse events occurred in 94.4% of the population, with the most common grade 3-4 AE being neutropenia (59.1%).
Our results confirm the efficacy and tolerability of CDK4/6i in routine clinical practice. This is the first real-world data describing and comparing the efficacy and toxicity of CDK4/6i in the Brazilian population.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)最近已被开发并引入临床实践。
我们回顾性分析了接受激素疗法联合瑞博西尼(R)、哌柏西利(P)或阿贝西利(A)治疗的确诊HR+/HER2转移性乳腺癌患者的数据。
无进展生存期(mPFS)、治疗中断时间(mTTD)和客观缓解率(ORR)。
2016年1月至2021年6月期间,142例患者接受了CDK4/6i治疗(79例接受P,42例接受R,21例接受A)。中位年龄为59岁,67.6%的患者患有复发性疾病。分别约35.2%、36.6%、28.2%的患者有1个、2个或3个以上转移部位,55.6%的患者接受CDK4/6i作为一线治疗。mPFS为28个月(R)对14个月(P)对6个月(A)(P = 0.002),一线治疗中接受R的患者比例更高。然而,当分析仅限于一线情况时,未发现差异(P = 0.193)。64例患者需要减少一剂,19例患者需要减少两剂。ORR为76.2%(R)对62%(P)对42.9%(A)。更多患者使用R和P实现了完全缓解,部分缓解和疾病稳定的发生率无差异。94.4%的人群发生了不良事件,最常见的3-4级不良事件是中性粒细胞减少(59.1%)。
我们的结果证实了CDK4/6i在常规临床实践中的疗效和耐受性。这是描述和比较CDK4/6i在巴西人群中的疗效和毒性的首个真实世界数据。