Orthopaedics, Lishui Central Hospital, Zheijiang, China.
Z Orthop Unfall. 2024 Aug;162(4):368-381. doi: 10.1055/a-1994-7500. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is one of the major and potentially life-threatening complications following major orthopedic surgeries. Research evidence comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis specific to total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been limited. Hence, this review was done to compare the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban against enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after THA.
We conducted a search in databases including Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library from inception until May 2021. Randomized controlled trials directly comparing the effectiveness of rivaroxaban and enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis among patients undergoing THA were eligible for inclusion. Outcome parameters assessed were efficacy in terms of total VTE and all-cause mortality, major VTE, deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic VTE, and safety in terms of major bleeding events, clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events, minor bleeding events, total bleeding events, drug-related adverse events, and wound infection. We performed a meta-analysis with a random effects model and reported a pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Eleven studies, including 9057 participants, were analyzed. Amongst efficacy outcomes, VTE and all-cause mortality pooled an RR of 0.58 (95% CI: 0.34-0.99), major VTE pooled an RR of 0.37 (95% CI: 0.15-0.90), deep vein thrombosis pooled an RR of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.32-1.02), and symptomatic VTE pooled an RR of 0.51 (95% CI: 0.30-0.87). Amongst safety outcomes, major bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.18 (95% CI: 0.77-1.80), total bleeding events pooled an RR of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.93-1.34), drug-related adverse event pooled an RR of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.87-1.12), and wound infection pooled an RR of 1.11 (95% CI: 0.58-2.14).
Rivaroxaban is a more efficacious drug in terms of VTE and all-cause mortality compared to enoxaparin following THA, and rivaroxaban was non-inferior in terms of safety profiles such as wound infection, bleeding, and drug-related adverse events.
静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)是骨科大手术后一种主要且潜在危及生命的并发症。专门针对全髋关节置换术(THA)的利伐沙班和依诺肝素预防血栓形成效果的研究证据有限。因此,本综述旨在比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素用于 THA 后预防血栓形成的疗效和安全性。
我们在数据库中进行了检索,包括 Medline、EMBASE、ScienceDirect、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library,检索时间从建库至 2021 年 5 月。符合纳入标准的是直接比较利伐沙班和依诺肝素用于 THA 患者预防血栓形成效果的随机对照试验。评估的结局参数包括总 VTE 和全因死亡率、主要 VTE、深静脉血栓形成、有症状 VTE 方面的疗效,以及大出血事件、临床相关非大出血事件、轻微出血事件、总出血事件、药物相关不良事件和伤口感染方面的安全性。我们采用随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,并报告了合并风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。
共分析了 11 项研究,包括 9057 名参与者。在疗效结局方面,VTE 和全因死亡率的合并 RR 为 0.58(95%CI:0.34-0.99),主要 VTE 的合并 RR 为 0.37(95%CI:0.15-0.90),深静脉血栓形成的合并 RR 为 0.57(95%CI:0.32-1.02),有症状 VTE 的合并 RR 为 0.51(95%CI:0.30-0.87)。在安全性结局方面,大出血事件的合并 RR 为 1.18(95%CI:0.77-1.80),总出血事件的合并 RR 为 1.12(95%CI:0.93-1.34),药物相关不良事件的合并 RR 为 0.99(95%CI:0.87-1.12),伤口感染的合并 RR 为 1.11(95%CI:0.58-2.14)。
与依诺肝素相比,利伐沙班在 THA 后 VTE 和全因死亡率方面是一种更有效的药物,在伤口感染、出血和药物相关不良事件等安全性特征方面,利伐沙班无显著差异。