Suppr超能文献

利伐沙班用于近期因急性传染病住院患者的血栓预防:MAGELLAN 研究的亚组分析。

Rivaroxaban for thromboprophylaxis among patients recently hospitalized for acute infectious diseases: a subgroup analysis of the MAGELLAN study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases and Gonda Vascular Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Bayer U.S. LLC, Whippany, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Thromb Haemost. 2018 Jul;16(7):1278-1287. doi: 10.1111/jth.14146. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Essentials Net benefit of venous thromboprophylaxis (VTE) in patients hospitalized for infections is unknown. MAGELLAN trial subgroup analysis was performed for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. At day 35, prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE compared to enoxaparin (4.2% vs. 6.6%). Rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced VTE in patients hospitalized for active lung infections.

SUMMARY

Background Despite the well-established association between infection and venous thromboembolism (VTE), there are few data specifically assessing the efficacy and safety of the VTE prophylaxis strategies for patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases. Objectives To estimate the incidence of VTE and bleeding outcomes, comparing prolonged prophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily for 35 days with enoxaparin 40 mg daily for 10 days. Patients/Methods A subgroup analysis of patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases in the MAGELLAN trial was performed. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of asymptomatic proximal or symptomatic VTE at days 10 and 35. The principal safety outcome was the composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Results Three thousand one hundred and seventy-three patients with acute infectious diseases leading to hospitalization were randomized to either rivaroxaban (n = 1585) or enoxaparin/placebo (n = 1588), and received at least one dose of study medication. At day 10, primary composite efficacy outcomes did not differ between prophylaxis strategies (rivaroxaban, 2.7%; and enoxaparin, 3.7%). At day 35, there were fewer VTE events with rivaroxaban (4.2%) than with enoxaparin (6.6%) (relative risk [RR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-0.92). Patients with pulmonary infections randomized to rivaroxaban had a lower incidence of VTE both at 10 days (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.28-0.90) and at 35 days (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33-0.87). Primary safety outcome events were increased with rivaroxaban (RR 2.42, 95% CI 1.60-3.66). Conclusions Prolonged rivaroxaban prophylaxis reduced the incidence of VTE in patients hospitalized for acute infectious diseases, particularly those involving the lungs. Efficacy benefits were, in part, offset by bleeding outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT 00571649.

摘要

目的

尽管感染与静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)之间存在明确关联,但针对急性传染病住院患者的 VTE 预防策略的疗效和安全性数据有限。

方法

在 MAGELLAN 试验中对急性传染病住院患者进行了亚组分析。主要疗效终点为第 10 天和第 35 天无症状近端或有症状 VTE 的复合终点。主要安全性终点为大出血或临床相关非大出血的复合终点。

结果

3173 例因急性传染病导致住院的患者被随机分为利伐沙班(n = 1585)或依诺肝素/安慰剂组(n = 1588),并至少接受一剂研究药物。在第 10 天,预防策略之间主要复合疗效终点无差异(利伐沙班为 2.7%,依诺肝素为 3.7%)。在第 35 天,利伐沙班的 VTE 事件发生率(4.2%)低于依诺肝素(6.6%)(相对风险 [RR] 0.64;95%置信区间 [CI] 0.45-0.92)。随机分到利伐沙班的肺部感染患者在第 10 天(RR 0.50,95% CI 0.28-0.90)和第 35 天(RR 0.54,95% CI 0.33-0.87)时 VTE 的发生率更低。利伐沙班的主要安全性终点事件发生率增加(RR 2.42,95% CI 1.60-3.66)。

结论

延长利伐沙班预防可降低急性传染病住院患者 VTE 的发生率,特别是肺部感染患者。疗效获益部分被出血结局所抵消。

临床试验注册号

NCT 00571649。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验