Mori Ricardo, Macaya Fernando, Giacobbe Federico, Salinas Pablo, Rolfo Cristina, Porto Italo, Gonzalo Nieves, Varbella Ferdinando, Cerrato Enrico, Escaned Javier
Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Cardiología Intervencionista, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IDISSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 15;377:22-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.01.067. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
The angiographic type 4 in SCAD is described as a total occlusion of the coronary artery and its management may differ according to its clinical presentation. We previously have observed that these patients present a low incidence of adverse events. Our objective was to describe clinical and angiographic characteristics of this condition, according to its initial management in the DISCO registry.
We conducted an observational study of consecutive SCAD patients from 26 centres of Italy and Spain (DISCO registry). Angiotype 4 SCAD cases were selected and classified according to the initial treatment chosen: conservative management vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical and angiographic characteristics were compared.
We recruited 81 (mean age 52.6 ± 11 years) patients with SCAD angiotype 4 out of 302 patients of the DISCO registry. Thirty-eight (46.9%) patients received conservative management and 43 (53.1%) received PCI. Nearly all patients undergoing PCI had ST-segment elevation (93% vs 47.4%, p < 0.0001), the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was more commonly involved (67.4% vs. 42.1%, p = 0.006), and they had more frequent proximal segment involvement (25.6% vs 2.7%, p = 0.004) and longer lesions (46.5 ± 23.2 mm vs 26.4 ± 18.8 mm, p = 0.017). On the other hand, non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (52.6% vs 2.3%, p = 0.001) and isolated involvement of secondary branches (55.3 vs 4.7, p < 0.0001) were more common in the conservative management group.
Patients with SCAD angiotype 4 who underwent PCI had a higher frequency of STEMI and involvement of proximal and longer coronary segments, particularly affecting the left anterior descending artery. NSTEMI and isolated involvement of secondary branches were more frequently found in those managed conservatively.
SCAD(自发性冠状动脉夹层)的血管造影4型被描述为冠状动脉完全闭塞,其治疗方法可能因其临床表现而异。我们之前观察到这些患者不良事件发生率较低。我们的目的是根据DISCO注册研究中的初始治疗方法,描述这种情况的临床和血管造影特征。
我们对来自意大利和西班牙26个中心的连续SCAD患者(DISCO注册研究)进行了一项观察性研究。选择血管造影4型SCAD病例,并根据所选的初始治疗方法进行分类:保守治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。比较临床和血管造影特征。
在DISCO注册研究的302例患者中,我们招募了81例(平均年龄52.6±11岁)血管造影4型SCAD患者。38例(46.9%)患者接受了保守治疗,43例(53.1%)接受了PCI。几乎所有接受PCI的患者都有ST段抬高(93%对47.4%,p<0.0001),左前降支(LAD)更常受累(67.4%对42.1%,p=0.006),并且近端节段受累更频繁(25.6%对2.7%,p=0.004),病变更长(46.5±23.2mm对26.4±18.8mm,p=0.017)。另一方面,非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(52.6%对2.3%,p=0.001)和二级分支单独受累(55.3对4.7,p<0.0001)在保守治疗组中更常见。
接受PCI的血管造影4型SCAD患者STEMI发生率更高,冠状动脉近端和较长节段受累,尤其影响左前降支。非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和二级分支单独受累在保守治疗的患者中更常见。