Suppr超能文献

[纸张混合垫厚度对玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度的影响]

[Influence of paper mixing pads thickness on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement].

作者信息

Zhou Q M, Ding R Y, Li L, Bai W, Hu J Y

机构信息

Department of General Dentistry Ⅱ, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China.

Department of Geriatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center of Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology & NHC Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry & NMPA Key Laboratory for Dental Materials, Beijing 100081, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Feb 18;55(1):78-81. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2023.01.011.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the influence of the thickness of mixed cardboard on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cement and the associated factors.

METHODS

Three different types of glass ionomer cements were mixed on the top of 60, 40, 20 and 1 pieces of paper (P60, P40, P20 and P1), respectively. The compressive strength of the materials was tested after solidification, and the bubble rate was calculated with the assistance of scanning electron microscope.

RESULTS

(1) Compressive strength: ① ChemFil Superior glass ionomer (CF): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was significantly different from that of P40 and P60 groups ( values were 0.041 and 0.032 respectively); ② To Fuji IX GP glass ionomer (IX): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was statistically different from that of P40 and P60 groups ( values were 0.042 and 0.038 respectively); ③ Glaslonomer FX-Ⅱ glass ionomer cement (FX): The average compressive strength of P1 group was the highest, which was statistically different from that of P20, P40 and P60 groups ( values were 0.031, 0.040 and 0.041 respectively), but there was no statistical difference among the other groups. All the three materials showed that the compressive strength of glass ions gradually increased with the decrease of the thickness of the blended paperboard, and the two materials had a highly linear negative correlation, the correlation coefficients of which were CF-0.927, IX-0.989, FX-0.892, respectively. (2) Scanning electron microscope: P1 group had the least bubbles among the three materials.

CONCLUSION

It indicates that the thickness of mixed cardboard has a negative correlation with the compressive strength of glass ions. The thicker the mixed cardboard is, the greater the elasticity is. Excessive elasticity will accelerate the mixing speed when the grinding glass ions. Studies have shown that the faster the speed of artificial mixing is, the more bubbles is produced.The thicker ther mixed cardboard is, the more bubblesn are generated by glass ionomer cement, and the higher the compressive strength is. Using one piece of paper board to mix glass ionomer cement has the least bubbles and can obtain higher compressive strength.

摘要

目的

探讨混合纸板厚度对玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度的影响及相关因素。

方法

分别在60、40、20和1张纸(P60、P40、P20和P1)上混合三种不同类型的玻璃离子水门汀。材料固化后测试其抗压强度,并借助扫描电子显微镜计算气泡率。

结果

(1)抗压强度:①化学固化型玻璃离子水门汀(CF):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P40和P60组相比有显著差异(P值分别为0.041和0.032);②富士IX GP玻璃离子水门汀(IX):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P40和P60组相比有统计学差异(P值分别为0.042和0.038);③玻璃离子水门汀FX -Ⅱ(FX):P1组平均抗压强度最高,与P20、P40和P60组相比有统计学差异(P值分别为0.031、0.040和0.041),但其他组之间无统计学差异。三种材料均显示玻璃离子的抗压强度随混合纸板厚度的减小而逐渐增加,且两种材料呈高度线性负相关,其相关系数分别为CF - 0.927、IX - 0.989、FX - 0.892。(2)扫描电子显微镜:三种材料中P1组气泡最少。

结论

表明混合纸板厚度与玻璃离子抗压强度呈负相关。混合纸板越厚,弹性越大。弹性过大在研磨玻璃离子时会加快混合速度。研究表明人工混合速度越快,产生的气泡越多。混合纸板越厚,玻璃离子水门汀产生的气泡越多,抗压强度越高。使用一张纸板混合玻璃离子水门汀产生的气泡最少,且能获得较高的抗压强度。

相似文献

4
Compressive fatigue limit of four types of dental restorative materials.四种牙科修复材料的压缩疲劳极限
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Aug;61:283-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验