Suppr超能文献

老年慢性完全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的健康状况结局。

Health Status Outcomes in Older Adults Undergoing Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

机构信息

Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute Kansas City MO.

University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City MO.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Feb 7;12(3):e027915. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027915. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

Abstract

Background Although chronic total occlusions (CTOs) are common in older adults, they are less likely to be offered CTO percutaneous coronary intervention for angina relief than younger adults. The health status impact of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention in adults aged ≥75 years has not been studied. We sought to compare technical success rates and angina-related health status outcomes at 12 months between adults aged ≥75 and <75 years in the OPEN-CTO (Outcomes, Patient Health Status, and Efficiency in Chronic Total Occlusion) registry. Methods and Results Angina-related health status was assessed with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (score range 0-100, higher scores denote less angina). Technical success rates were compared using hierarchical modified Poisson regression, and 12-month health status was compared using hierarchical multivariable linear regression between adults aged ≥75 and <75 years. Among 1000 participants, 19.8% were ≥75 years with a mean age of 79.5±4.1 years. Age ≥75 years was associated with a lower likelihood of technical success (adjusted risk ratio=0.92 [95% CI, 0.86-0.99; =0.02]) and numerically higher rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (9.1% versus 5.9%, =0.10). There was no difference in Seattle Angina Questionnaire Summary Score at 12 months between adults aged ≥75 and <75 years (adjusted difference=0.9 [95% CI, -1.4 to 3.1; =0.44]). Conclusions Despite modestly lower success rates and higher complication rates, adults aged ≥75 years experienced angina-related health status benefits after CTO-percutaneous coronary intervention that were similar in magnitude to adults aged <75 years. CTO percutaneous coronary intervention should not be withheld based on age alone in otherwise appropriate candidates.

摘要

背景 虽然慢性完全闭塞(CTO)在老年人中很常见,但与年轻患者相比,接受 CTO 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗以缓解心绞痛的可能性较小。年龄≥75 岁的 CTO 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对健康状况的影响尚未得到研究。我们旨在比较 OPEN-CTO(慢性完全闭塞患者结局、患者健康状况和效率)登记研究中年龄≥75 岁和<75 岁的成年人的技术成功率和 12 个月时与心绞痛相关的健康状况结局。

方法和结果 采用西雅图心绞痛问卷(评分范围 0-100,得分越高表示心绞痛越少)评估与心绞痛相关的健康状况。使用分层修正泊松回归比较技术成功率,使用分层多变量线性回归比较年龄≥75 岁和<75 岁的成年人在 12 个月时的健康状况。在 1000 名参与者中,19.8%的患者年龄≥75 岁,平均年龄为 79.5±4.1 岁。年龄≥75 岁与技术成功率较低相关(校正风险比=0.92 [95%CI,0.86-0.99;=0.02]),住院期间主要不良心血管事件的发生率也略高(9.1%与 5.9%,=0.10)。年龄≥75 岁和<75 岁的成年人在 12 个月时西雅图心绞痛问卷总分无差异(校正差值=0.9 [95%CI,-1.4 至 3.1;=0.44])。

结论 尽管成功率略低且并发症发生率略高,但接受 CTO 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的年龄≥75 岁的成年人在心绞痛相关健康状况方面获益与年龄<75 岁的成年人相似。在其他方面合适的患者中,不应仅根据年龄拒绝 CTO 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验