• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习预测游离皮瓣头颈部重建的并发症

The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction.

作者信息

Asaad Malke, Lu Sheng-Chieh, Hassan Abbas M, Kambhampati Praneeth, Mitchell David, Chang Edward I, Yu Peirong, Hanasono Matthew M, Sidey-Gibbons C

机构信息

Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Symptom Research, MD Anderson Center for INSPiRED Cancer Care, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2343-2352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13053-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-022-13053-3
PMID:36719569
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning has been increasingly used for surgical outcome prediction, yet applications in head and neck reconstruction are not well-described. In this study, we developed and evaluated the performance of ML algorithms in predicting postoperative complications in head and neck free-flap reconstruction.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive review of patients who underwent microvascular head and neck reconstruction between January 2005 and December 2018. Data were used to develop and evaluate nine supervised ML algorithms in predicting overall complications, major recipient-site complication, and total flap loss.

RESULTS

We identified 4000 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 33.7% of patients experienced a complication, 26.5% experienced a major recipient-site complication, and 1.7% suffered total flap loss. The k-nearest neighbors algorithm demonstrated the best overall performance for predicting any complication (AUROC = 0.61, sensitivity = 0.60). Regularized regression had the best performance for predicting major recipient-site complications (AUROC = 0.68, sensitivity = 0.66), and decision trees were the best predictors of total flap loss (AUROC = 0.66, sensitivity = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

ML accurately identified patients at risk of experiencing postsurgical complications, including total flap loss. Predictions from ML models may provide insight in the perioperative setting and facilitate shared decision making.

摘要

背景

机器学习已越来越多地用于手术结果预测,但在头颈部重建中的应用尚未得到充分描述。在本研究中,我们开发并评估了机器学习算法在预测头颈部游离皮瓣重建术后并发症方面的性能。

方法

我们对2005年1月至2018年12月期间接受微血管头颈部重建的患者进行了全面回顾。数据用于开发和评估九种监督式机器学习算法,以预测总体并发症、主要受区并发症和皮瓣完全坏死。

结果

我们确定了4000例符合纳入标准的患者。总体而言,33.7%的患者发生了并发症,26.5%的患者发生了主要受区并发症,1.7%的患者皮瓣完全坏死。k近邻算法在预测任何并发症方面表现出最佳的总体性能(曲线下面积=0.61,灵敏度=0.60)。正则化回归在预测主要受区并发症方面表现最佳(曲线下面积=0.68,灵敏度=0.66),决策树是皮瓣完全坏死的最佳预测指标(曲线下面积=0.66,灵敏度=0.50)。

结论

机器学习能够准确识别有术后并发症风险的患者,包括皮瓣完全坏死。机器学习模型的预测可能为围手术期情况提供见解,并促进共同决策。

相似文献

1
The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction.利用机器学习预测游离皮瓣头颈部重建的并发症
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Apr;30(4):2343-2352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-13053-3. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
2
The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: Caution Needed.机器学习在预测游离皮瓣头颈部重建并发症中的应用:需谨慎对待。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4232-4233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13428-0. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
3
Management of complications and compromised free flaps following major head and neck surgery.重大头颈外科手术后并发症及游离皮瓣受损的处理
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Jan;273(1):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3489-1. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
4
Management of the Acute Loss of a Free Flap to the Head and Neck-A Multi-institutional Review.头颈部游离皮瓣急性丢失的处理——多机构回顾。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Mar;131(3):518-524. doi: 10.1002/lary.28886. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
5
Machine Learning for Predicting Complications in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer.机器学习在头颈部微血管游离组织移植并发症预测中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E843-E849. doi: 10.1002/lary.28508. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
6
Management of Unfavorable Outcomes in Head and Neck Free Flap Reconstruction: Experience-Based Lessons from the MD Anderson Cancer Center.头颈部游离皮瓣重建术中不良结局的管理:来自MD安德森癌症中心基于经验的教训
Clin Plast Surg. 2016 Oct;43(4):653-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
7
Single Versus Simultaneous Double Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: Comparison of Flap Outcomes and Donor-Site Morbidity.单瓣与同期双游离皮瓣用于头颈部重建:皮瓣效果与供区并发症的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2019 Feb;82(2):184-189. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001713.
8
Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap: Critical Appraisal and Comparison to Alternate Reconstruction.锁骨上动脉岛状瓣:关键评价与其他重建方法比较。
Laryngoscope. 2022 Feb;132 Suppl 3:1-14. doi: 10.1002/lary.28706. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
9
Late free flap failure in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review.头颈部重建中晚期游离皮瓣失败:一项系统综述。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2018 Jul;97(7):213-216. doi: 10.1177/014556131809700712.
10
Management of Flap Failure After Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.头颈部重建后皮瓣失败的处理:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;167(2):224-235. doi: 10.1177/01945998211044683. Epub 2021 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial Intelligence in Microsurgical Planning: A Five-Year Leap in Clinical Translation.显微外科手术规划中的人工智能:临床转化的五年飞跃。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4574. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134574.
2
Machine-learning-based prediction of functional recovery in deep-pain-negative dogs after decompressive thoracolumbar hemilaminectomy for acute intervertebral disc extrusion.基于机器学习对急性椎间盘突出症行胸腰椎半椎板减压术后深部疼痛阴性犬功能恢复的预测
Vet Surg. 2025 May;54(4):665-674. doi: 10.1111/vsu.14250. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Machine Learning Predicts 30-Day Readmission and Mortality After Surgical Resection of Head and Neck Cancer.

本文引用的文献

1
Novel Machine Learning Approach for the Prediction of Hernia Recurrence, Surgical Complication, and 30-Day Readmission after Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.一种新的机器学习方法可预测腹壁重建术后疝复发、手术并发症和 30 天再入院率。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 May 1;234(5):918-927. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000141.
2
A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis.深度学习在医学影像疾病检测方面的性能与医疗保健专业人员的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Oct;1(6):e271-e297. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
机器学习预测头颈部癌手术切除后的30天再入院率和死亡率。
OTO Open. 2025 Mar 20;9(1):e70100. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70100. eCollection 2025 Jan-Mar.
4
Decoding the Impact of AI on Microsurgery: Systematic Review and Classification of Six Subdomains for Future Development.解读人工智能对显微外科手术的影响:六个子领域的系统评价及未来发展分类
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 20;12(11):e6323. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006323. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancer: Innovations, Applications, and Future Directions.人工智能在头颈部肿瘤中的应用:创新、应用和未来方向。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 6;31(9):5255-5290. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090389.
6
The use of artificial intelligence in reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer: a systematic review.人工智能在头颈部癌症重建手术中的应用:系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6057-6068. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08663-4. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
Predicting reoperation and readmission for head and neck free flap patients using machine learning.使用机器学习预测头颈部游离皮瓣患者的再次手术和再入院。
Head Neck. 2024 Aug;46(8):1999-2009. doi: 10.1002/hed.27690. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
8
Transforming breast reconstruction: the pioneering role of artificial intelligence in preoperative planning.乳房重建的变革:人工智能在术前规划中的开创性作用。
Gland Surg. 2023 Sep 25;12(9):1271-1275. doi: 10.21037/gs-23-265. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
9
Innovative Strategies in Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction.微血管头颈部重建的创新策略。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 24;59(7):1194. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071194.
10
The Use of Machine Learning for Predicting Complications of Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: Caution Needed.机器学习在预测游离皮瓣头颈部重建并发症中的应用:需谨慎对待。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;30(7):4232-4233. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13428-0. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
BPBSAM: Body part-specific burn severity assessment model.
BPBSAM:人体部位特定烧伤严重程度评估模型。
Burns. 2020 Sep;46(6):1407-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 May 4.
4
Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies.人工智能与临床医生:深度学习研究的设计、报告标准和主张的系统评价。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 25;368:m689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689.
5
Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Flap Failure in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.机器学习预测模型在微血管乳房重建中皮瓣失败的开发与评估。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;27(9):3466-3475. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08307-x. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Quantifying the Severity of Metopic Craniosynostosis: A Pilot Study Application of Machine Learning in Craniofacial Surgery.量化额缝早闭的严重程度:机器学习在颅面外科手术中的初步研究应用
J Craniofac Surg. 2020 May/Jun;31(3):697-701. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006215.
7
Machine Learning for Predicting Complications in Head and Neck Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer.机器学习在头颈部微血管游离组织移植并发症预测中的应用。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Dec;130(12):E843-E849. doi: 10.1002/lary.28508. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
A novel RBF-based predictive tool for facial distraction surgery in growing children with syndromic craniosynostosis.一种基于 RBF 的新型预测工具,用于综合征型颅缝早闭的生长中儿童的面部牵引手术。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Feb;15(2):351-367. doi: 10.1007/s11548-019-02063-4. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Machine Learning Approaches to Predict 6-Month Mortality Among Patients With Cancer.机器学习方法预测癌症患者 6 个月死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1915997. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15997.
10
Systematic review of machine learning for diagnosis and prognosis in dermatology.机器学习在皮肤病学诊断和预后中的系统评价。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2020 Aug;31(5):496-510. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1682500. Epub 2019 Oct 31.