Suppr超能文献

共享决策制定与未破裂腹主动脉瘤的管理:文献综述

Shared Decision Making and the Management of Intact Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: A Scoping Review of the Literature.

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;65(6):839-849. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.036. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to summarise the current knowledge of shared decision making (SDM) in patients facing a treatment decision about an intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), and to identify where further evidence is needed.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 18 July 2021. An updated search was run on 31 May 2022 for relevant studies published from 1 January 2000 to 31 May 2022.

REVIEW METHODS

This scoping review was undertaken in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines following a pre-defined protocol, retrieving studies reporting on aspects of SDM in those with intact AAAs. Qualitative synthesis of the articles was performed, and the results grouped according to theme.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles reporting on a total of 1 344 participants (age range 62-74 years) from hospital vascular surgery clinics with intact AAAs were included. Studies were observational (n = 9), non-randomised studies of an intervention (n = 3), and randomised clinical trials (n = 3). The first theme was the preferences and practice of SDM. The proportion of patients preferring SDM ranged from 58% to 95% (three studies), although objective rating of SDM practice was consistently < 50% (three studies). Clinician training improved SDM practice. The second theme was poor provision of information. Fewer than half of patients (0 - 46%) surveyed were informed about all available treatment options (three studies). Publicly available information sources were rated as poor. The third theme concerned the utility of decision making support tools (DSTs). Two randomised trials demonstrated that the provision of DSTs improves patient knowledge and agreement between patient preference and repair type received but not objective measures of SDM for patients with AAAs.

CONCLUSION

SDM for patients with an intact AAA appears to be in its infancy. Most patients with an AAA want SDM, but this is not commonly applied. Most patients with an AAA do not receive adequate information for SDM, although the use of bespoke DSTs leaves patients better informed to facilitate SDM.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在总结目前关于面临治疗决策的完整腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者的共享决策制定(SDM)的知识,并确定需要进一步研究的地方。

数据来源

2021 年 7 月 18 日在 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了检索。2022 年 5 月 31 日进行了更新检索,以查找 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间发表的相关研究。

研究方法

本范围界定综述按照事先确定的方案,根据《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南进行,检索报告完整 AAA 患者 SDM 各个方面的研究。对文章进行定性综合,并根据主题进行分组。

结果

共纳入 15 篇文章,总计 1344 名参与者(年龄范围 62-74 岁),均来自医院血管外科诊所的完整 AAA 患者。研究为观察性研究(n=9)、干预的非随机研究(n=3)和随机临床试验(n=3)。第一个主题是 SDM 的偏好和实践。从 58%到 95%的患者(三项研究)更喜欢 SDM,但客观评价的 SDM 实践始终<50%(三项研究)。临床医生培训提高了 SDM 实践。第二个主题是信息提供不足。接受调查的患者中,不到一半(0-46%)了解所有可用的治疗选择(三项研究)。公共信息来源的评价较差。第三个主题是决策支持工具(DSTs)的效用。两项随机试验表明,提供 DST 可提高患者知识和患者偏好与接受的修复类型之间的一致性,但不能提高 AAA 患者的客观 SDM 措施。

结论

AAA 患者的 SDM 似乎还处于起步阶段。大多数 AAA 患者希望进行 SDM,但这通常无法实现。大多数 AAA 患者没有获得足够的 SDM 信息,但使用定制的 DST 可使患者更好地了解信息,从而促进 SDM。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验