Yunusa Ismaeel, Rashid Nazia, Seyedin Roxanna, Paratane Deepika, Rajagopalan Krithika
College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Acadia Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2023 Sep;36(5):417-432. doi: 10.1177/08919887231154933. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
The current comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of atypical antipsychotics (AAPs) in treating Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP) are not entirely understood.
To evaluate comparative efficacy, safety, and acceptability of AAPs in patients with PDP.
We conducted a systematic review and a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of pimavanserin, quetiapine, olanzapine, clozapine, ziprasidone, and risperidone. We estimated relative standardized mean differences (SMDs) for continuous outcomes and odds ratios (OR) for binary outcomes, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
We included 19 unique studies evaluating AAPs in a total of 1,242 persons with PDP. Based on Clinical Global Impression Scale for Severity, pimavanserin (SMD, -4.81; 95% CI, -5.39, -4.24) and clozapine (SMD, -4.25; 95% CI, -5.24, -3.26) significantly improved symptoms compared with placebo. Also, compared to placebo, pimavanserin (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.07, 1.24) significantly improved psychotic symptoms based on Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms for Parkinson's Disease Psychosis/Hallucinations and Delusions scores. In comparison to placebo, clozapine (SMD, -0.69; 95% CI, -1.35, -0.02), pimavanserin (SMD, -0.01; 95% CI, -0.56, 0.53), and quetiapine (SMD, 0.00; 95% CI, -0.68, 0.69) did not impair motor function per Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating scale. Based on Mini-Mental State Examination scale, quetiapine (SMD, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.07, 1.14) significantly impaired cognition compared to placebo.
In patients with PDP, pimavanserin and clozapine demonstrated significant improvement in psychosis without affecting motor function. With quetiapine being associated with a significant decline in cognition and despite not impairing motor function, our findings suggest that it should be avoided in patients with PDP and reduced cognitive abilities.
目前非典型抗精神病药物(AAPs)治疗帕金森病精神病(PDP)的疗效、安全性和可接受性尚未完全明确。
评估AAPs治疗PDP患者的疗效、安全性和可接受性。
我们进行了一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以比较匹莫范色林、喹硫平、奥氮平、氯氮平、齐拉西酮和利培酮的疗效、安全性和可接受性。我们估计了连续性结局的相对标准化均数差(SMDs)和二分结局的比值比(OR)及其各自的95%置信区间(CIs)。
我们纳入了19项评估AAPs治疗1242例PDP患者的独特研究。根据临床总体印象严重程度量表,与安慰剂相比,匹莫范色林(SMD,-4.81;95%CI,-5.39,-4.24)和氯氮平(SMD,-4.25;95%CI,-5.24,-3.26)显著改善了症状。此外,与安慰剂相比,基于帕金森病精神病/幻觉和妄想评分的阳性症状评估量表,匹莫范色林(OR,1.16;95%CI,1.07,1.24)显著改善了精神病症状。与安慰剂相比,氯氮平(SMD,-0.69;95%CI,-1.35,-0.02)、匹莫范色林(SMD,-0.01;95%CI,-0.56,0.53)和喹硫平(SMD,0.00;95%CI,-0.68,0.69)根据统一帕金森病评定量表并未损害运动功能。根据简易精神状态检查表,与安慰剂相比,喹硫平(SMD,0.60;95%CI,0.07,1.14)显著损害认知功能。
在PDP患者中,匹莫范色林和氯氮平在不影响运动功能的情况下显著改善了精神病症状。由于喹硫平与认知功能显著下降有关,尽管不损害运动功能,但我们的研究结果表明,PDP和认知能力下降的患者应避免使用喹硫平。