Borek Aleksandra J, Edwards George, Santillo Marta, Wanat Marta, Glogowska Margaret, Butler Christopher C, Walker Ann Sarah, Hayward Gail, Tonkin-Crine Sarah
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
BJGP Open. 2023 Jun 27;7(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0170. Print 2023 Jun.
Antibiotic treatment duration may be longer than sometimes needed. Stopping antibiotics early, rather than completing pre-set antibiotic courses, may help reduce unnecessary exposure to antibiotics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR).
To identify clinicians' and patients' views on stopping antibiotics when better (SAWB) for urinary tract infections (UTIs), and to explore comparisons with other acute infections.
DESIGN & SETTING: An exploratory qualitative study with general practice clinicians and patients in England.
Primary care clinicians and patients who had recent UTI experience were recruited in England. Remote one-to-one interviews with clinicians and patients, and one focus group with patients, were conducted. Data were audiorecorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically.
Eleven clinicians (seven GPs) and 19 patients (14 with experience of recurrent and/or chronic UTIs) were included. All participants considered SAWB unfamiliar and contradictory to well-known advice to complete antibiotic courses, but were interested in the evidence for risks and benefits of SAWB. Clinicians were amenable if evidence and guidelines supported it, whereas patients were more averse because of concerns about the risk of UTI recurrence and/or complications and AMR. Participants viewed SAWB as potentially more appropriate for longer antibiotic courses and other infections (with longer courses and lower risk of recurrence and/or complications). Participants stressed the need for unambiguous advice and SAWB as part of shared decision making and personalised advice.
Patients were less accepting of SAWB, whereas clinicians were more amenable to it. Patients and clinicians require good evidence that this novel approach to self-determining antibiotic duration is safe and beneficial. If evidence based, SAWB should be offered with an explanation of why the advice differs from the 'complete the course' instruction, and a clear indication of when exactly to stop antibiotics should be given.
抗生素治疗疗程有时可能过长。提前停用抗生素,而非完成预设的抗生素疗程,可能有助于减少对抗生素的不必要暴露以及抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)。
确定临床医生和患者对于在病情好转时停用抗生素(SAWB)治疗尿路感染(UTIs)的看法,并探讨与其他急性感染的比较。
在英国对全科医生和患者进行的一项探索性定性研究。
招募了近期有UTI经历的基层医疗临床医生和患者。对临床医生和患者进行了远程一对一访谈,并对患者进行了一次焦点小组访谈。对数据进行了录音、转录和主题分析。
纳入了11名临床医生(7名全科医生)和19名患者(14名有复发性和/或慢性UTIs经历)。所有参与者都认为SAWB不常见,且与完成抗生素疗程这一众所周知的建议相矛盾,但他们对SAWB风险和益处的证据感兴趣。如果有证据和指南支持,临床医生会接受,而患者则更反感,因为担心UTI复发和/或并发症以及AMR的风险。参与者认为SAWB可能更适用于较长的抗生素疗程和其他感染(疗程较长且复发和/或并发症风险较低)。参与者强调需要明确的建议以及SAWB作为共同决策和个性化建议的一部分。
患者对SAWB的接受度较低,而临床医生则更愿意接受。患者和临床医生需要充分的证据来证明这种自行决定抗生素疗程的新方法是安全有益的。如果基于证据,应提供SAWB,并解释为何该建议与“完成疗程"的指示不同,以及明确指出具体何时应停止使用抗生素。