Clavien P A, Junod P, Chapuis G
Service de chirurgie, Hôpital de Zone, Morges.
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1987 Aug 15;117(33):1205-12.
776 patients seen in our emergency ward with abdominal pain for less than one week duration were prospectively analysed. In 49% of these patients no cause was found and 19% had acute appendicitis. Among 180 appendectomized patients, 147 (82%) had acute appendicitis whereas 33 (18%) had no inflammation of the appendix. Clinical presentation with a pain duration of less than 36 hours, steady abdominal pain, guarding in the right iliac fossa and a white cell count above 12,000/mm3 (12 g/l) were the best criteria for prediction of acute appendicitis versus a normal appendix. Perforated appendicitis was found in 18% of the patients with acute appendicitis but in only one patient for whom appendectomy had been deferred on the grounds of atypical presentation. Thus, in most cases, the perforation was preexistent to admission. We therefore recommended a 24-48-hour observation period for patients with uncertain diagnosis. Rates of normal appendices and perforated appendices of about 20% seem to be difficult to improve upon.
对我院急诊病房776例腹痛持续时间小于1周的患者进行了前瞻性分析。这些患者中,49%未发现病因,19%患有急性阑尾炎。在180例行阑尾切除术的患者中,147例(82%)患有急性阑尾炎,而33例(18%)阑尾无炎症。疼痛持续时间小于36小时、持续性腹痛、右下腹压痛及白细胞计数高于12,000/mm³(12 g/l)是预测急性阑尾炎与正常阑尾的最佳标准。在急性阑尾炎患者中,18%发现有穿孔性阑尾炎,但仅1例因表现不典型而推迟阑尾切除术的患者出现穿孔。因此,在大多数情况下,穿孔在入院前就已存在。我们因此建议对诊断不确定的患者进行24 - 48小时的观察期。正常阑尾和穿孔阑尾的比例约为20%,似乎很难再降低。