Pineda Estela, Domenech Marta, Hernández Ainhoa, Comas Silvia, Balaña Carmen
Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Medical Oncology, Institut Catala d'Oncologia (ICO) Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Onco Targets Ther. 2023 Jan 25;16:71-86. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S366371. eCollection 2023.
Virtually all glioblastomas treated in the first-line setting will recur in a short period of time, and the search for alternative effective treatments has so far been unsuccessful. Various obstacles remain unresolved, and no effective salvage therapy for recurrent glioblastoma can be envisaged in the short term. One of the main impediments to progress is the low incidence of the disease itself in comparison with other pathologies, which will be made even lower by the recent WHO classification of gliomas, which includes molecular alterations. This new classification helps refine patient prognosis but does not clarify the most appropriate treatment. Other impediments are related to clinical trials: glioblastoma patients are often excluded from trials due to their advanced age and limiting neurological symptoms; there is also the question of how best to measure treatment efficacy, which conditions the design of trials and can affect the acceptance of results by oncologists and medicine agencies. Other obstacles are related to the drugs themselves: most treatments cannot cross the blood-brain-barrier or the brain-to-tumor barrier to reach therapeutic drug levels in the tumor without producing toxicity; the drugs under study may have adverse metabolic interactions with those required for symptom control; identifying the target of the drug can be a complex issue. Additionally, the optimal method of treatment - local vs systemic therapy, the choice of chemotherapy, irradiation, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or a combination thereof - is not yet clear in glioblastoma in comparison with other cancers. Finally, in addition to curing or stabilizing the disease, glioblastoma therapy should aim at maintaining the neurological status of the patients to enable them to return to their previous lifestyle. Here we review currently available treatments, obstacles in the search for new treatments, and novel lines of research that show promise for the future.
几乎所有一线治疗的胶质母细胞瘤都会在短时间内复发,迄今为止,寻找替代有效治疗方法的努力均未成功。各种障碍仍未解决,短期内无法设想出针对复发性胶质母细胞瘤的有效挽救疗法。进展的主要障碍之一是与其他疾病相比,该疾病本身的发病率较低,而世界卫生组织最近对胶质瘤的分类(包括分子改变)会使这一发病率更低。这种新分类有助于细化患者预后,但并未阐明最合适的治疗方法。其他障碍与临床试验有关:胶质母细胞瘤患者由于年龄较大和存在限制性神经症状,往往被排除在试验之外;还存在如何最佳衡量治疗效果的问题,这会影响试验设计,并可能影响肿瘤学家和药品机构对结果的接受度。其他障碍与药物本身有关:大多数治疗方法无法穿过血脑屏障或脑肿瘤屏障,从而在不产生毒性的情况下使肿瘤达到治疗药物水平;正在研究的药物可能与控制症状所需的药物产生不良代谢相互作用;确定药物靶点可能是一个复杂的问题。此外,与其他癌症相比,胶质母细胞瘤的最佳治疗方法——局部治疗还是全身治疗、化疗、放疗、靶向治疗、免疫治疗或联合治疗——尚不清楚。最后,除了治愈或稳定疾病外,胶质母细胞瘤治疗还应旨在维持患者的神经状态,使他们能够恢复以前的生活方式。在此,我们综述了目前可用的治疗方法、寻找新治疗方法的障碍以及显示出未来前景的新研究方向。