Chair for Clinical Bioinformatics, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), Institute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health (ICNAS), University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2023 Jun;53(6):e13960. doi: 10.1111/eci.13960. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
Whereas Artificial Intelligence (AI) based tools have recently been introduced in the field of gastroenterology, application in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is in its infancies. We established AI-based algorithms to distinguish IBD from infectious and ischemic colitis using endoscopic images and clinical data.
First, we trained and tested a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) using 1796 real-world images from 494 patients, presenting with three diseases (IBD [n = 212], ischemic colitis [n = 157], and infectious colitis [n = 125]). Moreover, we evaluated a Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT) algorithm using five clinical parameters as well as a hybrid approach (CNN + GBDT). Patients and images were randomly split into two completely independent datasets. The proposed approaches were benchmarked against each other and three expert endoscopists on the test set.
For the image-based CNN, the GBDT algorithm and the hybrid approach global accuracies were .709, .792, and .766, respectively. Positive predictive values were .602, .702, and .657. Global areas under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and precision recall (PR) curves were .727/.585, .888/.823, and .838/.733, respectively. Global accuracy did not differ between CNN and endoscopists (.721), but the clinical parameter-based GBDT algorithm outperformed CNN and expert image classification.
Decision support systems exclusively based on endoscopic image analysis for the differential diagnosis of colitis, representing a complex clinical challenge, seem not yet to be ready for primetime and more diverse image datasets may be necessary to improve performance in future development. The clinical value of the proposed clinical parameters algorithm should be evaluated in prospective cohorts.
尽管人工智能(AI)工具最近已在胃肠病学领域中得到应用,但在炎症性肠病(IBD)中的应用仍处于起步阶段。我们建立了基于 AI 的算法,以使用内镜图像和临床数据来区分 IBD 与感染性和缺血性结肠炎。
首先,我们使用来自 494 名患者的 1796 张真实图像,针对三种疾病(IBD [n=212],缺血性结肠炎[n=157]和感染性结肠炎[n=125])训练和测试了卷积神经网络(CNN)。此外,我们使用五个临床参数评估了梯度提升决策树(GBDT)算法,以及一种混合方法(CNN+GBDT)。患者和图像被随机分为两个完全独立的数据集。在测试集中,将提出的方法与彼此以及三位专家内镜医生进行了比较。
对于基于图像的 CNN、GBDT 算法和混合方法,总体准确性分别为.709、.792 和.766。阳性预测值分别为.602、.702 和.657。接收器工作特征(ROC)和精度召回(PR)曲线下的总体面积分别为.727/.585、.888/.823 和.838/.733。CNN 与内镜医生之间的总体准确性没有差异(.721),但基于临床参数的 GBDT 算法优于 CNN 和专家图像分类。
用于区分结肠炎的专门基于内镜图像分析的决策支持系统(代表了复杂的临床挑战)似乎尚未准备好投入使用,并且可能需要更多的多样化图像数据集来提高未来开发中的性能。应该在前瞻性队列中评估所提出的临床参数算法的临床价值。