Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Experimental Immunology, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2023 Mar;28(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/jns.12533. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
The immunopathophysiological mechanisms underlying chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) in an individual patient are largely unknown. Better understanding of these mechanisms may aid development of biomarkers and targeted therapies. Both B- and T-cell dominant mechanisms have been implicated. We therefore investigated whether B-cell and T-cell receptor (BCR/TCR) repertoires might function as immunological biomarkers in CIDP. In this prospective cohort study, we longitudinally sampled peripheral blood of CIDP patients in three different phases of CIDP: starting induction treatment (IT), starting withdrawal from IVIg maintenance treatment (MT), and patients in remission (R). BCR and TCR repertoires were analyzed using RNA based high throughput sequencing. In baseline samples, the number of total clones, the number of dominant BCR and TCR clones and their impact on the repertoire was similar for patients in the IT, MT, and remission groups compared with healthy controls. Baseline samples in the IT or MT did not predict treatment response or potential relapse at follow-up. Treatment responders in the IT group showed a potential IVIg-induced increase in the number of dominant BCR clones and their impact at follow-up (baseline1.0 [IQR 1.0-2.8] vs. 6 m 3.5 [0.3-6.8]; P < .05, Wilcoxon test). Although the BCR repertoire changed over time, the TCR repertoire remained robustly stable. We conclude that TCR and BCR repertoire distributions do not predict disease activity, treatment response or response to treatment withdrawal.
个体慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)的免疫病理生理机制在很大程度上尚不清楚。更好地了解这些机制可能有助于开发生物标志物和靶向治疗方法。B 细胞和 T 细胞主导机制都有牵连。因此,我们研究了 B 细胞和 T 细胞受体(BCR/TCR)谱是否可以作为 CIDP 的免疫生物标志物。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们在 CIDP 的三个不同阶段(开始诱导治疗(IT)、开始停止 IVIg 维持治疗(MT)和缓解期(R))对 CIDP 患者的外周血进行了纵向采样。使用基于 RNA 的高通量测序分析 BCR 和 TCR 谱。在基线样本中,与健康对照组相比,处于 IT、MT 和缓解组的患者的总克隆数、优势 BCR 和 TCR 克隆数及其对 repertoire 的影响在基线时相似。IT 或 MT 中的基线样本不能预测治疗反应或随访时的潜在复发。在 IT 组中,治疗反应者在随访时显示出潜在的 IVIg 诱导的优势 BCR 克隆数增加及其影响(基线 1.0 [IQR 1.0-2.8] vs. 6 m 3.5 [0.3-6.8];P <.05,Wilcoxon 检验)。尽管 BCR 谱随时间发生变化,但 TCR 谱仍保持稳健稳定。我们得出结论,TCR 和 BCR 谱分布不能预测疾病活动、治疗反应或对治疗停药的反应。