Suppr超能文献

医疗保健获取的因素分析——以卵巢癌手术和妇科肿瘤专家咨询为例。

Factor Analysis of Health Care Access With Ovarian Cancer Surgery and Gynecologic Oncologist Consultation.

机构信息

Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.

Department of Biostatistics and Kentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2254595. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54595.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Poor health care access (HCA) is associated with racial and ethnic disparities in ovarian cancer (OC) survival.

OBJECTIVE

To generate composite scores representing health care affordability, availability, and accessibility via factor analysis and to evaluate the association between each score and key indicators of guideline-adherent care.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used data from patients with OC diagnosed between 2008 and 2015 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database. The SEER Medicare database uses cancer registry data and linked Medicare claims from 12 US states. Included patients were Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White individuals aged 65 years or older diagnosed from 2008 to 2015 with first or second primary OC of any histologic type (International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 3rd Edition [ICD-O-3] code C569). Data were analyzed from June 2020 to June 2022.

EXPOSURES

The SEER-Medicare data set was linked with publicly available data sets to obtain 35 variables representing health care affordability, availability, and accessibility. A composite score was created for each dimension using confirmatory factor analysis followed by a promax (oblique) rotation on multiple component variables.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The main outcomes were consultation with a gynecologic oncologist for OC and receipt of OC-related surgery in the 2 months prior to or 6 months after diagnosis.

RESULTS

The cohort included 8987 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 76.8 (7.3) years and 612 Black patients (6.8%), 553 Hispanic patients (6.2%), and 7822 White patients (87.0%). Black patients (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) and Hispanic patients (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99) were less likely to consult a gynecologic oncologist compared with White patients, and Black patients were less likely to receive surgery after adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics (aOR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.62-0.94). HCA availability and affordability were each associated with gynecologic oncologist consultation (availability: aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.24; affordability: aOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.20), while affordability was associated with receipt of OC surgery (aOR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15). In models mutually adjusted for availability, affordability, and accessibility, Black patients remained less likely to consult a gynecologic oncologist (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) and receive surgery (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black, and non-Hispanic White patients with OC, HCA affordability and availability were significantly associated with receiving surgery and consulting a gynecologic oncologist. However, these dimensions did not fully explain racial and ethnic disparities.

摘要

重要性

医疗保健可及性差与卵巢癌(OC)生存的种族和民族差异有关。

目的

通过因子分析生成代表医疗保健负担能力、可及性和可及性的综合评分,并评估每个评分与指南一致的护理关键指标之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用了 2008 年至 2015 年间在监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医疗保险数据库中诊断为 OC 的患者的数据。SEER 医疗保险数据库使用来自 12 个美国州的癌症登记数据和相关医疗保险索赔。纳入的患者为年龄在 65 岁或以上的西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人,诊断为 2008 年至 2015 年间任何组织学类型的第一或第二原发性 OC(国际肿瘤疾病分类,第 3 版 [ICD-O-3] 代码 C569)。数据于 2020 年 6 月至 2022 年 6 月进行分析。

暴露

SEER-医疗保险数据集与公开可用的数据集相关联,以获得 35 个变量,代表医疗保健的负担能力、可及性和可及性。使用验证性因子分析为每个维度创建一个综合评分,然后在多个组件变量上进行 promax(斜交)旋转。

主要结果和措施

主要结果是 OC 相关手术前 2 个月或诊断后 6 个月与妇科肿瘤学家协商和接受 OC 相关手术。

结果

该队列包括 8987 名患者,平均(SD)年龄为 76.8(7.3)岁,612 名黑人患者(6.8%),553 名西班牙裔患者(6.2%)和 7822 名白人患者(87.0%)。与白人患者相比,黑人患者(调整后的优势比 [aOR],0.75;95%CI,0.62-0.91)和西班牙裔患者(aOR,0.81;95%CI,0.67-0.99)不太可能咨询妇科肿瘤学家,而黑人患者在调整人口统计学和临床特征后不太可能接受手术(aOR,0.76;95%CI,0.62-0.94)。HCA 的可用性和负担能力均与妇科肿瘤学家的咨询相关(可用性:aOR,1.16;95%CI,1.09-1.24;负担能力:aOR,1.13;95%CI,1.07-1.20),而负担能力与 OC 手术的接受情况相关(aOR,1.08;95%CI,1.01-1.15)。在相互调整可用性、负担能力和可及性的模型中,黑人患者仍不太可能咨询妇科肿瘤学家(aOR,0.80;95%CI,0.66-0.97)和接受手术(aOR,0.80;95%CI,0.65-0.99)。

结论和相关性

在这项对西班牙裔、非西班牙裔黑人和非西班牙裔白人 OC 患者的队列研究中,HCA 的负担能力和可用性与接受手术和咨询妇科肿瘤学家密切相关。然而,这些维度并不能完全解释种族和民族差异。

相似文献

8
Race, Affordability and Utilization of Supportive Care in Ovarian Cancer Patients.种族、经济负担能力与卵巢癌患者支持性护理的利用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Dec;64(6):537-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.08.021. Epub 2022 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Crowdsourcing to measure financial toxicity in gynecologic oncology.妇科肿瘤学中财务毒性的众包评估。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 May;161(2):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
5
Sensitivity of Medicare Data to Identify Oncologists.医疗保险数据识别肿瘤学家的敏感性。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2020 May 1;2020(55):60-65. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgz030.
8
Impact of socioeconomic status on survival in patients with ovarian cancer.社会经济地位对卵巢癌患者生存的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 May;29(4):792-801. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000097. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
9
Racial disparities in treatment and survival from ovarian cancer.卵巢癌治疗和生存的种族差异。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;58:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Guideline Care and Cancer Deaths for Women with Ovarian Cancer.种族差异与卵巢癌女性的指南护理和癌症死亡。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Mar;28(3):539-545. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0285. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验