Applied Sport, Technology, Exercise and Medicine Research Centre, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.
Copenhagen University Hospital-Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark.
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Apr;25(4):287-292. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0542. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
In an in-patient switch study, 10 adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) performed 45 min of moderate-intensity exercise on 2 occasions: (1) when using their usual insulin pump (UP) and (2) after transitioning to automated insulin delivery (AID) treatment (MiniMed™ 780G). Consensus glucose management guidelines for performing exercise were applied. Plasma glucose concentrations measured over a 3-h monitoring period were stratified into time below range (TBR, <3.9 mmol/L), time in range (TIR, 3.9-10.0 mmol/L), and time above range (TAR, >10.0 mmol/L). Overall, TBR (UP: 11 ± 21 vs. AID: 3% ± 10%, = 0.413), TIR (UP: 53 ± 27 vs. AID: 66% ± 39%, = 0.320), and TAR (UP: 37 ± 34 vs. AID: 31% ± 41%, = 0.604) were similar between arms. A proportionately low number of people experienced exercise-induced hypoglycemia (UP: = 2 vs. AID: = 1, = 1.00). In conclusion, switching to AID therapy did not alter patterns of glycemia around sustained moderate-intensity exercise in adults with T1D. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT05133765.
在一项住院转换研究中,10 名 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成年人在两种情况下进行了 45 分钟的中等强度运动:(1)使用他们常用的胰岛素泵(UP),(2)转换为自动化胰岛素输送(AID)治疗(MiniMed™ 780G)。应用了进行运动的共识血糖管理指南。在 3 小时监测期间测量的血浆葡萄糖浓度分为以下几个时间段:(1)血糖低于目标范围(TBR,<3.9mmol/L),(2)血糖在目标范围内(TIR,3.9-10.0mmol/L),(3)血糖高于目标范围(TAR,>10.0mmol/L)。总体而言,TBR(UP:11±21%比 AID:3%±10%, = 0.413)、TIR(UP:53±27%比 AID:66%±39%, = 0.320)和 TAR(UP:37±34%比 AID:31%±41%, = 0.604)在两种治疗方式之间相似。低血糖发生的比例相对较低(UP: = 2 比 AID: = 1, = 1.00)。总之,转换为 AID 治疗并没有改变 1 型糖尿病成年人持续进行中等强度运动时的血糖模式。临床试验注册号:NCT05133765。