Sun Dapeng, Huo Xiaochuan, Jia BaiXue, Tong Xu, Wang Anxin, Ma Ning, Gao Feng, Mo Dapeng, Miao Zhongrong
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Dec;15(12):1201-1206. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020065. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
To explore the incidence, predictors, and association of first pass effect (FPE) on clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery occlusion (VBAO) in the Asian population.
We selected patients from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We defined FPE as complete recanalization after one MT attempt without rescue treatment, multiple pass effect (MPE) as complete recanalization after >1 MT attempt or after one MT attempt with rescue treatment, and incomplete recanalization (ICR) as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia score of 2b, independent of the number of MT attempts. We conducted multivariable logistic analyses to identify the independent predictors of FPE and to compare the outcomes, including favorable outcome, mortality within 90 days, and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) among the FPE, MPE, and ICR groups.
Two hundred and seventy-nine patients, 68 with FPE (24.4%), 114 with MPE (40.9%), and 83 with ICR (29.7%), were included. Underlying intracranial atherosclerosis disease (ICAD) (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.34, P<0.001) was independently associated with a low chance of FPE. Furthermore, FPE was associated with a favorable outcome compared with MPE and ICR (MPE vs FPE, aOR 0.49, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.97, P=0.040; ICR vs FPE, aOR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.81, P=0.012), and decreased mortality (MPE vs FPE, aOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.36, P=0.041) compared with MPE but similar mortality to ICR (P=0.374). No difference was found for ICH among the three groups (P>0.05).
FPE occurred in 24.4% of patients with VBAO in our cohort, which was associated with improved clinical outcomes compared with MPE and ICR. VBAO with underlying ICAD was less likely to achieve FPE.
NCT03370939.
探讨亚洲人群中首次通过效应(FPE)对急性椎基底动脉闭塞(VBAO)机械取栓(MT)临床结局的发生率、预测因素及相关性。
我们从ANGEL-ACT注册研究中选取患者。我们将FPE定义为一次MT尝试后无需补救治疗即实现完全再通,多次通过效应(MPE)定义为超过1次MT尝试后或一次MT尝试后进行补救治疗后实现完全再通,不完全再通(ICR)定义为改良脑缺血溶栓评分2b,与MT尝试次数无关。我们进行多变量逻辑分析以确定FPE的独立预测因素,并比较FPE、MPE和ICR组的结局,包括良好结局、90天内死亡率和颅内出血(ICH)。
共纳入279例患者,其中68例为FPE(24.4%),114例为MPE(40.9%),83例为ICR(29.7%)。颅内动脉粥样硬化疾病(ICAD)(调整后比值比(aOR)0.16,95%置信区间0.08至0.34,P<0.001)与FPE发生几率低独立相关。此外,与MPE和ICR相比FPE与良好结局相关(MPE与FPE比较,aOR 0.49,95%置信区间0.25至0.97,P=0.040;ICR与FPE比较,aOR 0.38,95%置信区间0.18至0.81,P=0.012),与MPE相比死亡率降低(MPE与FPE比较,aOR 2.57,95%置信区间1.04至6.36,P=0.041),但与ICR死亡率相似(P=0.374)。三组间ICH无差异(P>0.05)。
在我们的队列中,2