Suppr超能文献

用于重度污渍的不同洗涤程序的刺激潜力:短时间高强度还是长时间低强度?

Irritant potential of different washing procedures used for heavy-duty soiling: Short and intense or longer and mild?

作者信息

Gina Michal, Wichert Katharina, Pieper Birgit, Behrens Thomas, Brüning Thomas, Fartasch Manigé

机构信息

Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance (IPA), Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

German Social Accident Insurance - Institution for the Woodworking and Metalworking Industries (BGHM), Dortmund, Germany.

出版信息

Contact Dermatitis. 2023 May;88(5):363-371. doi: 10.1111/cod.14282. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To prevent irritant contact eczema even in occupational fields with heavy-duty soiling, it is generally recommended to use 'mild' hand cleansers (mild detergent without grits, MC). On the other hand, since grit-containing cleansers (GC) show a higher washing power that minimizes washing time, their usage is generally preferred in specific occupational fields.

OBJECTIVES

To compare whether a shorter, intense washing period might cause less skin damage than a longer washing period with an MC.

METHODS

Differences in cleaning time were first verified in a pilot study using standardized model dirt. In the main study, the forearms of 35 healthy volunteers were washed with three standardized procedures over a period of 3 days, either using 2 min of MC with/without hand brush or 1-min GC. Clinical scoring, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), corneometry, colourimetry and scaliness/roughness (Visioscan) were used to evaluate the epidermal barrier, topography and irritation.

RESULTS

The pre-study showed that washing time doubled when using MC vs. GC. Using GC resulted in stronger barrier disruption, even after a shorter washing period - median ΔT4-T1 TEWL 0.96 g/m /h vs. 4.91 g/m /h respectively, p < 0.0001. The most harmful procedure for the skin was the additional application of a hand brush (18.86 g/m /h).

CONCLUSIONS

Short-time washing with GC damages the skin barrier more significantly in comparison to a longer application of an MC. When washing with MC, the strongest irritant reaction occurred when accompanied with hand brushing.

摘要

背景

为预防刺激性接触性皮炎,即使在重度污染的职业领域,通常也建议使用“温和”的手部清洁剂(不含磨砂颗粒的温和洗涤剂,MC)。另一方面,由于含磨砂颗粒的清洁剂(GC)具有更高的洗涤能力,可将洗涤时间减至最短,因此在特定职业领域通常更倾向于使用此类清洁剂。

目的

比较较短时间的强力洗涤是否比使用MC进行较长时间洗涤对皮肤造成的损伤更小。

方法

在一项初步研究中,首先使用标准化模型污垢验证了清洁时间的差异。在主要研究中,35名健康志愿者的前臂在3天内采用三种标准化程序进行清洗,分别是使用或不使用手刷的2分钟MC,或1分钟GC。采用临床评分、经表皮水分流失(TEWL)、角质层测厚、比色法和鳞屑/粗糙度(Visioscan)来评估表皮屏障、表面形貌和刺激性。

结果

预研究表明,使用MC时的洗涤时间是使用GC时的两倍。使用GC即使在较短的洗涤时间后也会导致更强的屏障破坏——T4 - T1期间TEWL的中位数分别为0.96 g/m²/h和4.91 g/m²/h,p < 0.0001。对皮肤最有害的程序是额外使用手刷(18.86 g/m²/h)。

结论

与较长时间使用MC相比,短时间使用GC对皮肤屏障造成的损伤更显著。使用MC洗涤时,伴有手刷时刺激性反应最强。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验