Suppr超能文献

使用经过验证的不稳定评分系统比较1型侧方压缩型骨盆骨折的急诊科应激情况。

Comparing Emergency Department Stress of Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvis Fractures With a Validated Instability Scoring System.

作者信息

Dekeyser Graham J, Kellam Patrick J, Higgins Thomas F, Haller Justin M, Rothberg David L, Marchand Lucas S

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA (Dekeyser), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School at University of Texas Health, Houston, TX (Kellam), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT (Higgins, Haller, Rothberg, and Marchand).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr 15;31(8):e451-e458. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00160. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries represent a heterogeneous group of fractures with controversial surgical indications. Recently, multiple institutions have suggested the safety and reliability of an emergency department (ED) stress to evaluate for occult instability. The purpose of this study was to correlate ED stress examination of LC1 pelvis fractures against a validated fracture instability scoring system.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 70 patients presenting with minimally displaced LC1 fractures at a level 1 academic trauma center. All patients were stressed in the ED radiology suite, and displacement was measured by comparing calibrated stress radiographs with static radiographs (>10 mm displacement defined positivity). ED stress results were compared with radiographic scores assigned according to the validated Beckmann scoring system (score <7: stable-nonsurgical recommendation; score 7 to 9: indeterminant recommendation; and score >9: unstable-surgical recommendation).

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had a positive ED stress examination, and 57 patients stressed negative. The mean displacement was significantly different between the three groups (Beckmann 5 to 6: 3.31 mm, SD = 2.4; Beckmann 7 to 9: 4.23 mm, SD = 3.2; Beckmann 10+: 12.1 mm, SD = 8.6; P < 0.001). Zero of 18 patients in the stable group stressed positive, and only 3 of 38 patients in the indeterminant group stressed positive (7.9%). Finally, 10 of 14 patients in the unstable group stressed positive (71.4%; P < 0.001) . Sacral displacement ( P = 0.001), superior ramus location ( P < 0.02), and sacral columns ( P < 0.001) significantly predicted ED stress positivity in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of a validated instability scoring system with ED stress examination of minimally displaced LC1 fractures in awake and hemodynamically stable patients showed excellent correlation. This suggests that the ED stress examination is a useful diagnostic adjunct. LC1 fracture characteristics should be analyzed to determine which pelvic fracture characteristics determine occult instability before stress examination.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III diagnostic.

摘要

引言

1型侧方压缩型(LC1)骨盆环损伤代表了一组异质性骨折,其手术指征存在争议。最近,多个机构提出了急诊科(ED)应力检查以评估隐匿性不稳定的安全性和可靠性。本研究的目的是将LC1骨盆骨折的ED应力检查结果与经过验证的骨折不稳定评分系统进行关联。

方法

这是一项对一家一级学术创伤中心连续收治的70例LC1型轻微移位骨折患者的回顾性研究。所有患者均在急诊科放射科进行应力检查,并通过将校准后的应力X线片与静态X线片进行比较来测量移位情况(移位>10mm定义为阳性)。将ED应力检查结果与根据经过验证的贝克曼评分系统分配的影像学评分进行比较(评分<7:稳定-非手术建议;评分7至9:不确定建议;评分>9:不稳定-手术建议)。

结果

13例患者的ED应力检查结果为阳性,57例患者为阴性。三组之间的平均移位存在显著差异(贝克曼评分5至6:3.31mm,标准差=2.4;贝克曼评分7至9:4.23mm,标准差=3.2;贝克曼评分10+:12.1mm,标准差=8.6;P<0.001)。稳定组的18例患者中无一例应力检查结果为阳性,不确定组的38例患者中只有3例应力检查结果为阳性(7.9%)。最后,不稳定组的14例患者中有10例应力检查结果为阳性(71.4%;P<0.001)。在多变量分析中,骶骨移位(P=0.001)、耻骨上支位置(P<0.02)和骶骨柱(P<0.001)显著预测了ED应力检查结果为阳性。

结论

在清醒且血流动力学稳定的患者中,将经过验证的不稳定评分系统与LC1型轻微移位骨折的ED应力检查结果进行比较,显示出良好的相关性。这表明ED应力检查是一种有用的诊断辅助手段。在进行应力检查之前,应分析LC1骨折的特征,以确定哪些骨盆骨折特征决定隐匿性不稳定。

证据水平

III级诊断。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验