• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分小于4分的胸腰椎骨折的早期手术治疗

Early Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scores Less Than 4.

作者信息

Lucasti Christopher, Scott Maxwell M, Slowinski Joshua, Maraschiello Mark, Clark Lindsey D, Kowalski Joseph M

机构信息

From the UBMD Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine Doctors Buffalo, Buffalo, NY (Lucasti, Clark, and Kowalski) and the Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY (Scott, Slowinski, and Maraschiello).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 May 1;31(9):e481-e488. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00694. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00694
PMID:36727915
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thoracolumbar fractures (TLFs) are the most common spinal fractures seen in patients with trauma. The Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) classification system is commonly used to help clinicians make more consistent and objective decisions in assessing the indications for surgical intervention in patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Patients with TLICS scores <4 are treated conservatively, but a percentage of them will have failed conservative treatment and require surgery at a later date.

METHODS

All patients who received an orthopaedic consult between January 2016 and December 2020 were screened for inclusion and exclusion criteria. For patients meeting the study requirements, deidentified data were collected including demographics, diagnostics workup, and hospital course. Data analysis was conducted comparing length of stay, time between first consult and surgery, and time between surgery and discharge among each group.

RESULTS

1.4% of patients with a TLICS score <4 not treated surgically at initial hospital stay required surgery at a later date. Patients with a TLICS score <4 treated conservatively had a statistically significant shorter hospital stay compared with those treated surgically. However, when time between initial consult and surgery was factored into the total duration of hospital stay for those treated surgically, the duration was statistically equivalent to those treated nonsurgically.

CONCLUSION

For patients with a TLICS score <4 with delayed mobilization after 3 days in the hospital or polytraumatic injuries, surgical stabilization at initial presentation can decrease the percentage of patients who fail conservative care and require delayed surgery. Patients treated surgically have a longer length of stay than those treated conservatively, but there is no difference in stay when time between consult and surgery was accounted for. In addition, initial surgery in patients with delayed mobilization can prevent long waits to surgery, while conservative measures are exhausted.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective cohort study.

摘要

背景

胸腰椎骨折(TLFs)是创伤患者中最常见的脊柱骨折。胸腰椎损伤分类与严重程度(TLICS)分类系统常用于帮助临床医生在评估胸腰椎骨折患者的手术干预指征时做出更一致、客观的决策。TLICS评分<4分的患者采用保守治疗,但其中一部分患者保守治疗会失败,后期需要手术。

方法

对2016年1月至2020年12月期间接受骨科会诊的所有患者进行纳入和排除标准筛查。对于符合研究要求的患者,收集去识别化的数据,包括人口统计学、诊断检查和住院过程。进行数据分析,比较每组患者的住院时间、首次会诊与手术之间的时间以及手术与出院之间的时间。

结果

初次住院时未接受手术治疗的TLICS评分<4分的患者中有1.4%后期需要手术。与接受手术治疗的患者相比,保守治疗的TLICS评分<4分的患者住院时间在统计学上显著更短。然而,将手术治疗患者的首次会诊与手术之间的时间计入总住院时间后,其住院时间在统计学上与非手术治疗患者相当。

结论

对于住院3天后活动延迟或多发伤的TLICS评分<4分的患者,初次就诊时进行手术稳定可降低保守治疗失败并需要延迟手术的患者比例。手术治疗的患者住院时间比保守治疗的患者长,但计入会诊与手术之间的时间后住院时间无差异。此外,活动延迟患者的初次手术可避免在保守措施用尽时等待手术的漫长时间。

证据级别

III级证据:回顾性队列研究。

相似文献

1
Early Surgical Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures With Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scores Less Than 4.胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分小于4分的胸腰椎骨折的早期手术治疗
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 May 1;31(9):e481-e488. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00694. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Multicenter retrospective evaluation of the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score system in children.儿童胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分系统有效性的多中心回顾性评估
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Aug;18(2):164-70. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.PEDS15663. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
3
Is the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) Superior to the AO Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System for Guiding the Surgical Management of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures without Neurological Deficit?对于无神经功能缺损的不稳定胸腰椎爆裂骨折的手术治疗指导,胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)是否优于AO胸腰椎损伤分类系统?
Turk Neurosurg. 2018;28(1):94-98. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.19094-16.2.
4
Outcomes in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures With a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Score (TLICS) of 4 Treated With Surgery Versus Initial Conservative Management.胸腰椎爆裂骨折采用手术治疗与初始保守治疗的疗效比较:胸腰椎损伤分类评分(TLICS)为4分的病例
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E317-E321. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000656.
5
Retrospective evaluation of the validity of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification System in 458 consecutively treated patients.回顾性评估 458 例连续治疗患者的胸腰椎损伤分类系统的有效性。
Spine J. 2013 Dec;13(12):1760-5. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
6
The complement of the load-sharing classification for the thoracolumbar injury classification system in managing thoracolumbar burst fractures.胸腰椎损伤分类系统中负载分担分类在处理胸腰椎爆裂骨折方面的补充内容。
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jan;18(1):81-6. doi: 10.1007/s00776-012-0319-4. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
7
Measuring the impact of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score among 458 consecutively treated patients.评估胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分对458例连续接受治疗患者的影响。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2014 Jan;37(1):101-6. doi: 10.1179/2045772313Y.0000000134. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Conservative Treatment Compared With Surgical Treatment for Thoracolumbar Fracture With Score 4 Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS): A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保守治疗与手术治疗胸腰椎骨折评分 4 型胸腰椎损伤分类和严重程度(TLICS)的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2024 Jun 1;37(5):230-241. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001503. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
9
Superiority of thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) over AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification for the surgical management decision of traumatic spine injury in the pediatric population.胸腰椎损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)优于 AOSpine 胸腰椎损伤分类,用于指导儿童创伤性脊柱损伤的手术治疗决策。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Oct;30(10):3036-3042. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06681-4. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Retrospective Analysis of Thoracolumbar Junction Injuries Using the Thoracolumbar Injury Severity and Classification Score, American Spinal Injury Association Class, Injury Severity Score, Age, Sex, and Length of Hospitalization.使用胸腰椎损伤严重程度和分类评分、美国脊髓损伤协会分级、损伤严重程度评分、年龄、性别及住院时间对胸腰段交界区损伤进行回顾性分析
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015 Aug;28(7):E410-6. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182a14743.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of mTLICS versus TLICS and TL AOSIS in stratifying three-tier treatment for thoracolumbar injuries: focus on intermediate score range.在对胸腰椎损伤进行三层治疗分层时,mTLICS与TLICS及TL AOSIS的诊断准确性和临床效用:聚焦于中间评分范围
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Sep 1;26(1):824. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09124-7.