• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨科创伤协会成员的单星负面在线评论特征分析。

Characterizing Single-star Negative Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members.

作者信息

Richman Evan H, Kuttner Nicolas P, Foster Lukas O, Bruske Christopher J, Pollock Jordan R, Brinkman Joseph C, Little Milton T M

机构信息

From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO (Richman), the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN (Kuttner), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (Foster and Little), the Creighton University School of Medicine - Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ (Bruske), the Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ (Pollock), and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ (Brinkman).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr 15;31(8):397-404. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00631. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00631
PMID:36727955
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to characterize factors that contribute to 1-star negative reviews regarding orthopaedic trauma surgeons.

METHODS

A search was done for Orthopaedic Trauma Association members on Yelp.com , Healthgrade.com , and Vitals.com in New York, Boston, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Dallas, Phoenix, Seattle, Baltimore, Denver, Houston, Philadelphia, and Washington, DC. All single-star reviews (out of a possible 5 stars) were included in this study. Reviews were categorized as either clinical or nonclinical and then further subcategorized. Categorical variables were analyzed using a chi-square test. The rate ratio (the ratio of the rate for nonsurgical divided by surgical reviews) was determined for each category.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-eight single-star reviews were included in the study, comprising 655 total complaints. Of all complaints, 274 (41.8%) were clinically related and 381 (58.2%) were nonclinical. Of the 288 single-star reviews, 96 (33.3%) were from surgically treated patients and 192 (66.7%) were from nonsurgical patients. Most complaints were in reference to nonclinical aspects of care such as physician bedside manner (173 reviews, 60%), not enough time spent with provider (58 reviews, 20%), and wait time (42 complaints, 15%). The most common clinical complaints were for complication (61 reviews, 21%), disagree with decision/plan (49 reviews, 17%), and uncontrolled pain (45 reviews, 16%). Surgical patients had a significantly higher rate of clinical complaints than nonsurgical patients (1.57 vs. 0.64 clinical complaints per review, P < 0.001). Nonsurgical patients had a significantly higher rate of nonclinical complaints than surgical patients (1.43 vs. 1.10 nonclinical complaints per review, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Most 1-star reviews referenced a nonclinical aspect of care with a physician's bedside manner being the most common complaint. Surgical patients were markedly more likely to reference a clinical aspect of care, such as complications or misdiagnosis compared with nonsurgical patients, who more commonly referenced nonclinical aspects of care.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是确定导致骨科创伤外科医生获得一星差评的因素。

方法

在Yelp.com、Healthgrade.com和Vitals.com上搜索纽约、波士顿、旧金山、洛杉矶、达拉斯、菲尼克斯、西雅图、巴尔的摩、丹佛、休斯顿、费城和华盛顿特区的骨科创伤协会成员。本研究纳入了所有一星评价(满分5星)。评价被分为临床或非临床两类,然后进一步细分。分类变量采用卡方检验进行分析。确定每个类别的比率比(非手术评价的比率除以手术评价的比率)。

结果

本研究纳入了288条一星评价,共包含655条投诉。在所有投诉中,274条(41.8%)与临床相关,381条(58.2%)与非临床相关。在288条一星评价中,96条(33.3%)来自接受手术治疗的患者,192条(66.7%)来自非手术患者。大多数投诉涉及护理的非临床方面,如医生的床边态度(173条评价,60%)、与医护人员相处时间不足(58条评价,20%)和等待时间(42条投诉,15%)。最常见的临床投诉是并发症(61条评价,21%)、不同意治疗决策/方案(49条评价,17%)和疼痛控制不佳(45条评价,16%)。手术患者的临床投诉率明显高于非手术患者(每条评价的临床投诉率分别为1.57和0.64,P<0.001)。非手术患者的非临床投诉率明显高于手术患者(每条评价的非临床投诉率分别为1.43和1.10,P<0.001)。

讨论

大多数一星评价提到了护理的非临床方面,其中医生的床边态度是最常见的投诉。与非手术患者相比,手术患者明显更有可能提到护理的临床方面,如并发症或误诊,而非手术患者更常提到护理的非临床方面。

相似文献

1
Characterizing Single-star Negative Online Reviews of Orthopaedic Trauma Association Members.骨科创伤协会成员的单星负面在线评论特征分析。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr 15;31(8):397-404. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00631. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.描述小儿矫形外科医生的负面在线评论。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2022;42(5):e533-e537. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002121.
3
What Patients Say About Their Orthopaedic Hand and Wrist Surgeons: A Qualitative Analysis of Negative Reviews on Yelp.患者对其骨科手部和腕部外科医生的评价:对Yelp上负面评论的定性分析。
J Wrist Surg. 2023 Aug 17;13(3):202-207. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1768924. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
An Analysis of Negative One-star Patient Reviews and Complaints for Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons throughout the United States: A Retrospective Study.美国儿科骨科医生的负一星患者评价和投诉分析:一项回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2024 Feb 1;44(2):129-134. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002571. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
5
The Majority of Complaints About Orthopedic Sports Surgeons on Yelp Are Nonclinical.Yelp上关于骨科运动外科医生的大多数投诉都与临床无关。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 18;3(5):e1465-e1472. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.008. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Characterizing Extremely Negative Reviews of Ophthalmologists on Yelp.Com.评价眼科学家的极端差评在 Yelp.com 上的特征。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 4;37(5):661-667. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2022.2064193. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
7
Analysis of Negative Reviews of Orthopedic Oncology Surgeons: An Investigation of Reviews from Healthgrades, Vitals, and Google.骨科肿瘤外科医生负面评价分析:对来自Healthgrades、Vitals和谷歌的评价的调查
Sarcoma. 2022 Dec 10;2022:4351427. doi: 10.1155/2022/4351427. eCollection 2022.
8
What Makes a 5-Star Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeon? An Analysis of Positive Online Patient Reviews.是什么造就了五星级骨科运动医学外科医生?对在线患者好评的分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Jul 12;11(7):23259671231181378. doi: 10.1177/23259671231181378. eCollection 2023 Jul.
9
An examination of negative one-star patient reviews for foot and ankle orthopedic surgery: A retrospective analysis.对足部和踝关节矫形外科的一星差评患者评论进行分析:一项回顾性分析。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2024 Apr;30(3):252-257. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
10
Assessing extremely negative online patient reviews and complaints of musculoskeletal oncology surgeons in the United States: a retrospective analysis.评估美国肌肉骨骼肿瘤外科医生的极负面在线患者评论和投诉:回顾性分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 23;19(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04881-y.

引用本文的文献

1
"They Gave Me One Star?" An Analysis of Online Reviews of Hand Surgeons.“他们给了我一星?”手部外科医生在线评论分析
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2025 Mar 15;7(3):100711. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2025.02.004. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Examining One-Star Reviews in Orthopaedic Hand Surgeons in Large U.S. Cities.审视美国大城市骨科手外科医生的一星评价。
J Wrist Surg. 2024 Jan 31;14(2):194-199. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1779446. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Natural Language Processing of Sentiments Identified in Patient Comments Associated with Less Than Top-Rated Care.
与非顶级护理相关的患者评论中所识别情绪的自然语言处理
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 21;12:23743735251323677. doi: 10.1177/23743735251323677. eCollection 2025.
4
Categorizing Extremely Positive Five-Star Online Reviews for Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons: A Retrospective Study.对足踝外科医生的五星级在线好评进行分类:一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 20;16(10):e71932. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71932. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Assessing extremely negative online patient reviews and complaints of musculoskeletal oncology surgeons in the United States: a retrospective analysis.评估美国肌肉骨骼肿瘤外科医生的极负面在线患者评论和投诉:回顾性分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 23;19(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04881-y.