Institute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia; and.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Sep 1;37(9):e521-e526. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004479. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Mäestu, J, Lelle, R, Mäestu, E, Pind, R, Vahtra, E, Purge, P, and Mikulic, P. Long-term rowing performance development in male Olympic and World Championship medal winners compared with nonmedalists. J Strength Cond Res 37(9): e521-e526, 2023-The purpose of this study was, first, to investigate individual longitudinal 2,000 m rowing ergometer performance (2,000 erg) development of world class male rowers from the beginning of their career until reaching the elite level and to compare ELITE performance development with those who did not reach podium places and, second, to provide 2,000 erg milestones for talent prediction in rowing. Individual annual 2,000 erg performances of 54 male rowers were analyzed from age 15 and throughout their career. Olympic or World Championships medal winners (ELITE; n = 11) were compared with those who did not reach international podium places. Two thousand erg increased ( p ≤ 0.05) until the age of 24 in ELITE, while plateaued earlier for less successful rowers. No differences in the rate of performance improvement were found between ELITE and lower performers ( p > 0.05). At the age of 20, performance between ELITE and international level nonmedal winners reached significant difference (480.7 ± 20.9 W vs. 435.3 ± 33.9 W, respectively) and remained different onwards ( p ≤ 0.05). However, the average of the 10 best seasons cross-sectional performances of less successful rowers were significantly higher until age 18, compared with ELITE. ELITE rowers were able to improve their 2,000 erg performance to higher age; therefore, it is difficult to predict elite performers in junior rowers. Cross-sectional performances of less successful rowers may indicate temporary high-level performers, who might not be able to advance the elite level.
梅斯图、J、莱勒、R、梅斯图、E、平德、R、瓦赫特拉、E、普日格、P 和米库利奇、P. 与非奖牌获得者相比,男性奥运和世界锦标赛奖牌获得者的长期赛艇表现发展。J 力量与调理研究 37(9):e521-e526,2023-本研究的目的首先是调查世界级男性赛艇运动员从职业生涯开始到达到精英水平的个人纵向 2000 米划艇测功仪表现(2000 测功)发展,并将精英表现发展与那些未获得奖牌的人进行比较,其次是为划船的人才预测提供 2000 测功里程碑。对 54 名男性赛艇运动员从 15 岁开始的个人年度 2000 测功成绩进行了分析。将奥运或世界锦标赛奖牌获得者(精英;n = 11)与那些没有获得国际领奖台的人进行了比较。2000 测功在精英中一直增加(p ≤ 0.05),直到 24 岁,而对于表现较差的运动员来说,更早达到平台期。在表现提高的速度方面,精英和表现较差的运动员之间没有差异(p > 0.05)。在 20 岁时,精英和国际水平非奖牌获得者之间的表现达到显著差异(480.7 ± 20.9 W 与 435.3 ± 33.9 W,分别),并且一直保持不同(p ≤ 0.05)。然而,表现较差的运动员的 10 个最佳赛季的平均横截面表现直到 18 岁都明显高于精英。精英赛艇运动员能够将他们的 2000 测功成绩提高到更高的年龄;因此,很难在青少年赛艇运动员中预测精英运动员。表现较差的运动员的横截面表现可能表明是暂时的高水平运动员,他们可能无法晋升为精英水平。