Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA.
University of Arizona, College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ; and.
J Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jun 1;37(6):e258-e263. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002565.
To compare anterior hook plating with established fixation constructs biomechanically and report outcomes and complications in a cohort of patella fractures treated with the technique.
Laboratory-based biomechanical study and clinical multicenter retrospective cohort study.
2 US Level 1 trauma centers.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 51 patients (28 M and 23 F) with 30 simple transverse and 21 comminuted patella fractures. Thirty-six cadaveric patellae were used for the biomechanical study.
Biomechanical-dorsal plating was compared with cerclage wiring and modified tension band cable fixation in a comminuted patella fracture model in 36 cadaveric patellae. Constructs were tested at 0° and 45 degrees of flexion. Clinical-we reviewed a consecutive series of patella fractures in 2 centers for outcome and complications.
Biomechanical-construct stiffness. Clinical-reduction, union, complications, and range of motion.
Stiffness was greatest in dorsal plating at both 0° and 45 degrees. Dorsal plating (976 N, 1643 N) > modified tension band (317 N, 297 N) > cerclage (89.8 N, 150.3 N) at 0 and 45 degrees, respectively. 51 patients with patella fractures had them fixed with dorsal 2.7-mm mini fragment plates including a distal to proximal lag screw through the plate from the nose of the patella. 9 cases were small distal fragments not easily managed with screws and cables. All patients were followed up to union. There were 2 infections (1 superficial and 1 deep with nonunion), and 5 had implant removal (9.8%).
Dorsal plating is biomechanically and clinically superior to modified tension band and cerclage techniques in comminuted patella fractures. This method allows for fixation of small distal pole fractures.
Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
比较前钩钢板与既定固定结构的生物力学性能,并报告采用该技术治疗髌骨骨折的患者的结果和并发症。
基于实验室的生物力学研究和临床多中心回顾性队列研究。
美国 2 个 1 级创伤中心。
患者/参与者:51 例髌骨骨折患者(28 例男性和 23 例女性),其中 30 例为单纯横断骨折,21 例为粉碎性髌骨骨折。36 个尸体髌骨用于生物力学研究。
在粉碎性髌骨骨折模型中,比较背侧钢板与环扎钢丝和改良张力带钢缆固定的生物力学性能,在 36 个尸体髌骨中分别在 0°和 45°进行测试。临床-我们在 2 个中心回顾了一系列连续的髌骨骨折病例,以评估结果和并发症。
生物力学-结构刚度。临床-复位、愈合、并发症和活动范围。
在 0°和 45°时,背侧钢板的刚度最大。背侧钢板(976 N,1643 N)>改良张力带(317 N,297 N)>环扎(89.8 N,150.3 N),分别在 0°和 45°。51 例髌骨骨折患者采用 2.7mm 微型背侧碎片钢板固定,包括从髌骨鼻尖向近端通过钢板的拉力螺钉。9 例为小的远端碎片,难以用螺钉和钢缆固定。所有患者均随访至愈合。有 2 例感染(1 例浅表,1 例深部伴不愈合),5 例患者取出植入物(9.8%)。
背侧钢板在粉碎性髌骨骨折的生物力学和临床方面优于改良张力带和环扎技术。该方法可固定小的远端极骨折。
治疗 IV 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。