Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物的使用与谵妄风险:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Statin Use and Delirium Risk: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Ther. 2023;30(4):e326-e335. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001593. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Findings on the association of statin use with delirium risk are inconsistent.

THE STUDY QUESTION

Is statin use associated with delirium risk?

STUDY DESIGN

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and the EMBASE database, limiting the search to human patients and articles in English published until December 31, 2021. The effect size and 95% confidence interval (CI) were defined as the odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI, respectively, to indicate the difference in the incidence of delirium between statin use and nonuse groups. A random-effects model was selected in the case of high heterogeneity of study populations. We used funnel plots, Egger test, Duval and Tweedie trim-and-fill approach, and the classic fail-safe N to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

Of a total of 264 identified studies, 13 were selected for the qualitative review-4 RCTs and 9 observational cohort studies. Statin use was not associated with low delirium risk (pooled OR, 0·82; 95% CI, 0·64-1·04; P = 0·09). Substantial statistical heterogeneity was observed ( I2 , 90%). Visual inspection of the funnel plot of ORs from the studies revealed symmetry. Using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, we assigned the evidence a rating of C and a weak recommendation for this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use is not associated with delirium risk. More comprehensive RCTs are required to confirm the results.

摘要

背景

关于他汀类药物使用与谵妄风险之间关联的研究结果并不一致。

研究问题

他汀类药物的使用与谵妄风险是否相关?

研究设计

我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆和 EMBASE 数据库,将检索范围限定为人类患者和截至 2021 年 12 月 31 日以英文发表的文章。效应量和 95%置信区间(CI)定义为比值比(OR)和 95%CI,以表示使用和不使用他汀类药物的患者群体中谵妄发生率的差异。在研究人群存在高度异质性的情况下,选择了随机效应模型。我们使用漏斗图、Egger 检验、Duval 和 Tweedie 修剪和填充方法以及经典的失效安全 N 来评估发表偏倚。

结果

在总共 264 项确定的研究中,有 13 项被选入定性综述-4 项 RCT 和 9 项观察性队列研究。他汀类药物的使用与低谵妄风险无关(汇总 OR,0.82;95%CI,0.64-1.04;P=0.09)。观察到了显著的统计学异质性(I2,90%)。对来自研究的 OR 的漏斗图进行视觉检查显示出对称性。使用推荐评估、制定和评估方法,我们将证据评为 C 级,并对本次综述给出了弱推荐。

结论

他汀类药物的使用与谵妄风险无关。需要进行更全面的 RCT 来证实这一结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验