• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性开角型青光眼与原发性闭角型青光眼小梁切除术和晶状体切除小梁切除术的两年疗效

Two-Year Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Phacotrabeculectomy in Primary Open Angle Versus Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.

作者信息

Winuntamalakul Yolradee, Chansangpetch Sunee, Ratanawongphaibul Kitiya, Itthipanichpong Rath, Manassakorn Anita, Tantisevi Visanee, Rojanapongpun Prin

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society.

Center of Excellence in Glaucoma, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2023 May 1;32(5):374-381. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002172. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002172
PMID:36728543
Abstract

PRCIS

Phacotrabeculectomy had a significantly lower 24-month failure rate than the isolated trabeculectomy in both the primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) patients. The impact of adding phacoemulsification to trabeculectomy was found to be similar between the eyes with POAG and PACG.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the 2-year outcomes of primary mitomycin C-augmented combined phacotrabeculectomy (Phaco+Trab) with isolated trabeculectomy (Trab) in phakic patients with POAG and PACG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed primary glaucoma patients who underwent mitomycin C-augmented trabeculectomy and completed 2 years of follow-up. Failure rate, postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), percentage of IOP reduction, and the number of glaucoma medications at 24 months after surgery were compared between the Phaco+Trab and Trab groups.

RESULTS

The study included 146 eyes of 121 patients; 74 underwent Trab and 72 underwent Phaco+Trab. POAG and PACG were present in 71 and 75 eyes, respectively. Defining a failure with IOP criteria of >18 mm Hg or IOP reduction of <30%, the failure rates were 42% and 62% for Phaco+Trab and Trab, respectively. The Phaco+Trab group had a significantly lower failure rate than the Trab group for all subjects [risk ratio (RR): 0.60, 95% CI, 0.44-0.81, P =0.001], POAG subgroup (RR: 0.61, 95% CI, 0.41-0.93, P =0.02), and PACG subgroup (RR: 0.53, 95% CI, 0.33-0.86, P =0.01). Differences in the postoperative IOP, percentage of IOP reduction, and number of glaucoma medications were not significant between the 2 groups for all subjects, POAG, and PACG (all P >0.05). The magnitude of the effects of adding phacoemulsification to the trabeculectomy was comparable for the POAG and PACG groups, for each outcome (all P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The final 24-month failure rate in the Phaco+Trab group was lower than that in the Trab group in both the POAG and PACG subjects. The impact of adding phacoemulsification to trabeculectomy was found to be similar between the eyes with POAG and PACG.

摘要

PRCIS

在原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和原发性闭角型青光眼(PACG)患者中,超声乳化小梁切除术的24个月失败率显著低于单纯小梁切除术。在POAG和PACG眼中,小梁切除术联合超声乳化的效果相似。

目的

本研究旨在比较原发性丝裂霉素C强化的超声乳化小梁切除术(超声乳化+小梁切除术)与单纯小梁切除术(小梁切除术)在患有POAG和PACG的有晶状体眼患者中的2年疗效。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了接受丝裂霉素C强化小梁切除术并完成2年随访的原发性青光眼患者。比较了超声乳化+小梁切除术组和小梁切除术组术后24个月的失败率、眼压(IOP)、眼压降低百分比以及青光眼药物使用数量。

结果

该研究纳入了121例患者的146只眼;74只眼接受了小梁切除术,72只眼接受了超声乳化+小梁切除术。POAG和PACG分别存在于71只眼和75只眼中。以眼压>18 mmHg或眼压降低<30%作为失败标准,超声乳化+小梁切除术组和小梁切除术组的失败率分别为42%和62%。对于所有受试者[风险比(RR):0.60,95%置信区间(CI),0.44 - 0.81,P = 0.001]、POAG亚组(RR:0.61,95% CI,0.41 - 0.93,P = 0.02)和PACG亚组(RR:0.53,95% CI,0.33 - 0.86,P = 0.01),超声乳化+小梁切除术组的失败率显著低于小梁切除术组。两组在所有受试者、POAG和PACG中的术后眼压、眼压降低百分比以及青光眼药物使用数量的差异均无统计学意义(所有P>0.05)。对于每个结局,在POAG组和PACG组中,小梁切除术联合超声乳化的效果大小相当(所有P>0.05)。

结论

在POAG和PACG受试者中,超声乳化+小梁切除术组的最终24个月失败率均低于小梁切除术组。在POAG和PACG眼中,小梁切除术联合超声乳化的效果相似。

相似文献

1
Two-Year Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Phacotrabeculectomy in Primary Open Angle Versus Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma.原发性开角型青光眼与原发性闭角型青光眼小梁切除术和晶状体切除小梁切除术的两年疗效
J Glaucoma. 2023 May 1;32(5):374-381. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002172. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
2
Postoperative complications after glaucoma surgery for primary angle-closure glaucoma vs primary open-angle glaucoma.原发性闭角型青光眼与原发性开角型青光眼青光眼手术后的术后并发症
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;129(8):987-92. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.71. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
3
Comparative study of surgical outcomes of twin-site phacotrabeculectomy with mitomycin C in primary open-angle glaucoma versus primary angle-closure glaucoma.双眼外路小梁切开联合丝裂霉素 C 治疗原发性开角型青光眼与原发性闭角型青光眼的手术效果对比研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Nov;71(11):3528-3533. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_324_23.
4
Phacotrabeculectomy in treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.晶状体小梁切除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul-Aug;48(4):408-11. doi: 10.1007/s10384-003-0075-2.
5
Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Phacogoniosynechialysis With Phacotrabeculectomy in the Management of Refractory Acute Primary Closure Angle Glaucoma With Cataract: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.比较晶状体睫状体分离术与小梁切除术治疗难治性急性原发性闭角型青光眼合并白内障的安全性和有效性:一项多中心随机试验
J Glaucoma. 2021 Jul 1;30(7):552-558. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001868.
6
Success rates of 2-site phacoemulsification combined with fornix-based trabeculectomy using mitomycin C for primary angle-closure glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma in an Asian population.在亚洲人群中,两点式超声乳化联合丝裂霉素C穹窿部小梁切除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼和原发性开角型青光眼的成功率。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 May;61(3):245-252. doi: 10.1007/s10384-017-0502-4. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Uneventful Phacoemulsification after Trabeculectomy in Pseudoexfoliation Glaucoma versus Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.超声乳化白内障吸除术后在假性剥脱综合征和原发性开角型青光眼。
Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):672-680. doi: 10.1159/000529642. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
8
Mitomycin C-augmented Phacotrabeculectomy Versus Phacoemulsification in Primary Angle-closure Glaucoma: A Randomized Controlled Study.丝裂霉素 C 增强的房角切开小梁切除术与超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗原发性闭角型青光眼的随机对照研究。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Oct;28(10):911-915. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001345.
9
Phaco-goniosynechialysis versus phaco-trabeculectomy in patients with refractory primary angle-closure glaucoma: a comparative study.超声乳化白内障吸除术联合房角分离术与超声乳化白内障吸除术联合小梁切除术治疗难治性原发性闭角型青光眼的对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr 6;23(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12886-023-02885-6.
10
Comparison of bleb morphologies between phacoemulsification combined with Ex-PRESS mini shunt implantation, phacotrabeculectomy and trabeculectomy alone: a two-year retrospective in vivo confocal microscopy study.超声乳化白内障吸除联合 Ex-PRESS 引流阀植入术、白内障超声乳化联合小梁切除术与单纯小梁切除术治疗青光眼的滤过泡形态比较:一项为期两年的体内共聚焦显微镜回顾性研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2024 Mar 6;24(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03364-2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Comparison of Phaco-tube vs. Phaco-trabeculectomy in Glaucoma Patients.青光眼患者超声乳化白内障吸除术与超声乳化白内障吸除联合小梁切除术的回顾性比较
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Sep-Oct;7(5):466-475. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.04.008. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
2
Late closure of trabecular opening after bent needle ab-interno goniectomy.弯针经内路房角切开术后小梁开口的延迟闭合
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Feb 14;17(2):e256559. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256559.