A Randomized Study Comparing Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy with Standard Care in Immediate Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer remains the most common nonskin cancer among women. Prophylactic methods for reducing surgical-site complications after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) are crucial to prevent acellular dermal matrices or prosthesis exposure and loss. The authors assessed the impact of closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy (ciNPWT) versus standard dressings (ST) after IBR on surgical-site complications, superficial skin temperature (SST), skin elasticity, and subjective scar quality, to determine the potential benefit of prophylactic ciNPWT application.

METHODS

A multicenter randomized controlled study of 60 adult female patients was conducted between January of 2019 and July of 2021. All patients had oncologic indications for IBR using implants or expanders.

RESULTS

Application of ciNPWT correlated with a significant decrease in surgical-site complications within 1 year of surgery (total, 40%; ST, 60%; ciNPWT, 20%; P = 0.003) and resulted in more elastic scar tissue as measured with a Cutometer (average coefficient of elasticity, 0.74; ST, 0.7; ciNPWT, 0.9; P < 0.001). The SST of each scar 1 week after surgery was significantly higher in the ciNPWT group (average SST, 31.5; ST SST, 31.2; ciNPWT SST, 32.3; P = 0.006). According to the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.0, subjective scar outcomes in both groups were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized controlled study that demonstrated a significant decrease in surgical-site wound complications within 1 year of surgery in IBR patients receiving ciNPWT. A high probability of postoperative radiotherapy should be a relative indication for the use of ciNPWT. .

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.