Suppr超能文献

因骨形态发生蛋白的超说明书使用导致的医疗事故诉讼

Medical Malpractice Litigation Due to Off-Label Use of Bone Morphogenetic Protein.

机构信息

John A Burns School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI.

School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023 Nov 15;48(22):1575-1580. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004563. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence and characteristics of malpractice lawsuits pertaining to the off-label use of Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

BMP continues to be a popular alternative to the use of autologous bone graft during spinal fusion procedures. However, ~85% of BMP is used in an off-label manner, which may expose surgeons to claims of malpractice.

METHODS

Westlaw and VerdictSearch were queried for malpractice claims filed between 2000 and 2022 using the keywords "bone graft" and "spine." Case inclusion criteria were defined as a plaintiff's basis of litigation resting on a claim of medical malpractice due to off-label use of BMP. Additional collected data included the date of the case hearing, plaintiff's sex and age, defendants named in the lawsuit, verdict ruling, location of the filed claim, payment or settlement amount, sustained injuries, and additional allegations.

RESULTS

Of 971 claims reviewed, 89 cases were due to off-label BMP use. The posterior approach was identified as the most common approach among the 89 cases. Of the 30 cases naming a surgeon defendant, 50% included allegations of insufficient informed consent. The most frequent adverse events were ectopic bone growth resulting in chronic pain or nerve damage. Zero cases involved heterotopic ossification, wound dehiscence, graft subsidence, hematoma, bladder retention, or retrograde ejaculation.

CONCLUSION

A clear understanding that on-label BMP use is specific to single-level, anterior or anterolateral approaches between L2-S1 with vendor-specific cages is crucial for mitigating malpractice disputes. Though off-label use of BMP may incite litigation, the findings suggest court rulings are favorable for defendants as zero cases, resulting in plaintiff verdicts. Nevertheless, surgeons should balance the potential benefits of off-label use of BMP with the increased risk of litigation, and it may be advisable to disclose the use of BMP, whether on-label or off-label, in the informed consent.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

分析与骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)的标签外使用相关的医疗事故诉讼的发生率和特征。

背景资料概要

BMP 在脊柱融合手术中继续作为自体骨移植物的替代物而广受欢迎。然而,约 85%的 BMP 是标签外使用的,这可能使外科医生面临医疗事故索赔的风险。

方法

使用关键词“骨移植物”和“脊柱”,在 Westlaw 和 VerdictSearch 上查询了 2000 年至 2022 年期间提交的医疗事故索赔。案例纳入标准定义为:由于标签外使用 BMP 而导致医疗事故索赔的原告的诉讼依据。收集的数据包括案件审理日期、原告的性别和年龄、诉讼中被点名的被告、裁决结果、提出索赔的地点、支付或和解金额、受伤情况以及其他指控。

结果

在审查的 971 项索赔中,有 89 项是由于标签外 BMP 使用引起的。在这 89 个案例中,后路被确定为最常见的方法。在 30 个点名外科医生为被告的案例中,有 50%的案例包括对知情同意不足的指控。最常见的不良事件是异位骨生长导致慢性疼痛或神经损伤。没有案例涉及异位骨化、伤口裂开、移植物下沉、血肿、膀胱潴留或逆行射精。

结论

明确了解标签内 BMP 使用仅限于特定供应商的笼具在 L2-S1 之间的单节段、前路或前外侧入路,对于减轻医疗事故纠纷至关重要。尽管 BMP 的标签外使用可能引发诉讼,但调查结果表明,法庭裁决对被告有利,因为没有导致原告胜诉的案例。然而,外科医生应该权衡 BMP 标签外使用的潜在益处与诉讼风险的增加,并在知情同意书中披露 BMP 的使用情况,无论是标签内还是标签外,可能是明智的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验