Suppr超能文献

头痛手术中基于证据的患者选择:术前射频消融对手术结果的影响。

Evidence-Based Patient Selection in Headache Surgery: Impact of Preoperative Radiofrequency Ablation on Surgical Outcomes.

作者信息

Casari Maria E, Chartier Christian, Gfrerer Lisa, Austen William G

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 May 1;151(5):1071-1077. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010044. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the greater occipital nerve (GON) is a minimally invasive treatment option commonly used in patients with occipital neuralgia. Patients who undergo occipital surgery for headaches after failed RFA treatment present a unique opportunity to evaluate RFA-treated occipital nerves and determine the impact on headache surgery outcomes.

METHODS

Of 115 patients who underwent headache surgery at the occipital site, 29 had a history of RFA treatment. Migraine Headache Index, Pain Self- Efficacy Questionnaire, and Pain Health Questionnaire-2 outcome scores were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up visits. Intraoperative macroscopic nerve damage and surgical outcomes were compared between RFA-treated and non-RFA-treated patients.

RESULTS

RFA-treated patients had a higher rate of macroscopic nerve damage (45%) than non-RFA-treated patients (24%) ( P = 0.03), and they were significantly more likely to require a second operation at the site of primary decompression (27.6% versus 5.8%; P = 0.001) and GON transection (13.8% versus 3.5%; P = 0.04). Outcome scores at the last follow-up visit showed no statistically significant difference between RFA-treated and non-RFA-treated patients ( P = 0.96).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA-treated patients can ultimately achieve outcomes that are not significantly different from non-RFA-treated patients in occipital headache surgery. However, a higher number of secondary operations at the site of primary decompression and nerve transection are required to treat refractory symptoms. RFA-treated patients should be counseled about an increased risk of same-site surgery and possible GON transection to achieve acceptable outcomes.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

摘要

背景

枕大神经(GON)的射频消融术(RFA)是枕神经痛患者常用的一种微创治疗选择。经RFA治疗失败后接受枕部头痛手术的患者为评估经RFA治疗的枕神经以及确定其对头痛手术结果的影响提供了独特的机会。

方法

在115例行枕部头痛手术的患者中,29例有RFA治疗史。术前及随访时记录偏头痛头痛指数、疼痛自我效能问卷和疼痛健康问卷-2的结果评分。比较RFA治疗组和非RFA治疗组患者术中肉眼可见的神经损伤情况及手术结果。

结果

RFA治疗组患者肉眼可见神经损伤的发生率(45%)高于非RFA治疗组患者(24%)(P = 0.03),且RFA治疗组患者在初次减压部位(27.6% 对5.8%;P = 0.001)和GON横断术(13.8% 对3.5%;P = 0.04)时更有可能需要二次手术。最后一次随访时的结果评分显示,RFA治疗组和非RFA治疗组患者之间无统计学显著差异(P = 0.96)。

结论

在枕部头痛手术中,RFA治疗组患者最终可获得与非RFA治疗组患者无显著差异的结果。然而,为治疗难治性症状,在初次减压部位和神经横断术时需要进行更多的二次手术。应告知接受RFA治疗的患者,同部位手术风险增加以及可能需要进行GON横断术以获得可接受的结果。

临床问题/证据级别:治疗性,III级

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验