• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Kerasave 和 Optisol-GS 角膜保存液的体外前瞻性比较。

Prospective In Vitro Comparison of Kerasave and Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Solutions.

机构信息

Lions VisionGift, Portland, OR.

Research and Development Department of AL.CHI.MI.A. S.R.L., Ponte San Nicolò (PD), Italy; and.

出版信息

Cornea. 2023 May 1;42(5):630-638. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003201. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1097/ICO.0000000000003201
PMID:36729660
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of Kerasave and Optisol-GS for hypothermic corneal storage for 14 days.

METHODS

This study was a prospective laboratory investigation. Mate corneas were recovered into Kerasave or Optisol-GS (27 pairs) and stored at 2°C to 8°C for 14 days. Corneas were evaluated by trained eye bank technicians, and study parameters were compared between the initial and final evaluations. Endothelial cell density (ECD), hexagonality (HEX), and coefficient of variation (CV) were evaluated by specular microscopy, and central corneal thickness (CCT) was examined by optical coherence tomography after 1, 3, 7, and 14 days of storage. Corneal transparency was scored using slit lamp examination at days 1 and 14.

RESULTS

Average ECD, HEX, and CV for the Kerasave (2653 ± 303 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 4%, and 36 ± 3%) and Optisol-GS (2623 ± 306 cells/mm 2 , 57 ± 5%, and 36 ± 4%) groups were not significantly different at day 1. There was also no difference at any other study time points (all P > 0.05). ECD did not significantly change from day 1 to day 14 in either group ( P > 0.05), but a statistically significant change in HEX and CV was observed between day 1 and day 14 in both groups ( P < 0.01). Average CCT measured at day 1 for corneas stored in Kerasave was 622 ± 49 μm and those stored in Optisol-GS was 580 ± 35 μm ( P < 0.01). The difference in CCT measurements was not significantly different at day 14 (Kerasave: 674 ± 46 μm vs. Optisol-GS: 647 ± 58 μm, P > 0.05). Corneal transparency was not significantly different between the 2 groups at day 1 or day 14.

CONCLUSIONS

The corneal quality and clinically relevant parameters including ECD, endothelial morphometry, and corneal transparency were not different in corneas stored in Kerasave or Optisol-GS for 14 days. The initial difference in CCT between the 2 groups decreased at day 14. These results demonstrated that Kerasave corneal storage solution preserves the corneal endothelium similarly to Optisol-GS.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较 Kerasave 和 Optisol-GS 在 14 天低温角膜保存中的性能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性实验室研究。将供体角膜分别回收至 Kerasave 或 Optisol-GS(27 对)中,并在 2°C 至 8°C 下储存 14 天。由经过培训的眼库技术人员对角膜进行评估,并比较初始和最终评估之间的研究参数。通过共焦显微镜评估内皮细胞密度(ECD)、六边形(HEX)和变异系数(CV),并在储存后 1、3、7 和 14 天通过光学相干断层扫描检查中央角膜厚度(CCT)。在第 1 天和第 14 天使用裂隙灯检查对角膜透明度进行评分。

结果

Kerasave(2653±303 个细胞/mm 2 、57±4%和 36±3%)和 Optisol-GS(2623±306 个细胞/mm 2 、57±5%和 36±4%)组的平均 ECD、HEX 和 CV 在第 1 天均无显著差异。在其他任何研究时间点也没有差异(均 P>0.05)。在这两个组中,从第 1 天到第 14 天,ECD 均无显著变化(P>0.05),但在这两个组中,HEX 和 CV 在第 1 天和第 14 天之间均观察到统计学显著变化(P<0.01)。Kerasave 储存的角膜在第 1 天的平均 CCT 为 622±49μm,Optisol-GS 储存的角膜为 580±35μm(P<0.01)。第 14 天 CCT 测量值的差异无统计学意义(Kerasave:674±46μm 对比 Optisol-GS:647±58μm,P>0.05)。在第 1 天或第 14 天,两组之间的角膜透明度无显著差异。

结论

在 14 天的 Kerasave 或 Optisol-GS 储存中,角膜质量和临床相关参数(包括 ECD、内皮形态计量学和角膜透明度)没有差异。两组之间在第 14 天 CCT 的初始差异减小。这些结果表明,Kerasave 角膜储存液可与 Optisol-GS 一样有效地保存角膜内皮。

相似文献

1
Prospective In Vitro Comparison of Kerasave and Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Solutions.Kerasave 和 Optisol-GS 角膜保存液的体外前瞻性比较。
Cornea. 2023 May 1;42(5):630-638. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000003201. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Performance of New Hypothermic Corneal Storage Media With an Antimycotic Tablet in Comparison to Traditional Hypothermic Media During Simulated Eye Bank Processing.新型低温角膜保存介质联合抗真菌片剂在模拟眼库处理中与传统低温保存介质的性能比较。
Cornea. 2020 Aug;39(8):1031-1039. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002333.
3
A new storage medium containing amphotericin B versus Optisol-GS for preservation of human donor corneas.一种含两性霉素B的新型储存介质与Optisol-GS用于保存人类供体角膜的比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;106(2):184-189. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-317136. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
4
A Prospective, In Vitro, Randomized Study to Compare Two Media for Donor Corneal Storage.一项比较两种供体角膜保存介质的前瞻性体外随机研究。
Cornea. 2016 Sep;35(9):1151-5. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000912.
5
Comparison of structural integrity and functional status of corneal endothelium stored in Cornisol and Optisol-GS.比较角膜内皮细胞在 Cornisol 和 Optisol-GS 中储存的结构完整性和功能状态。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;67(10):1579-1584. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2026_18.
6
Effect of transfer of donor corneal tissue from McCarey-Kaufmann medium to Optisol-GS on corneal endothelium.供体角膜组织从 McCarey-Kaufmann 培养基转移到 Optisol-GS 对角膜内皮的影响。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;66(2):219-222. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_677_17.
7
Comparison of Chen Medium and Optisol-GS for human corneal preservation at 4 degrees C: results of transplantation.4℃下陈培养基与Optisol-GS用于人角膜保存的比较:移植结果
Cornea. 2001 Oct;20(7):683-6. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200110000-00003.
8
In vitro comparison of Chen medium and Optisol-GS medium for human corneal storage.陈培养基与Optisol-GS培养基用于人角膜储存的体外比较。
Cornea. 2000 Nov;19(6):782-7. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200011000-00005.
9
Preservation of the Corneal Epithelium in Different Corneal Storage Media.不同角膜储存介质中角膜上皮的保存
Cornea. 2015 Nov;34(11):1400-3. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000601.
10
Corneal temperature reversal after storage in Chen medium compared with Optisol GS.与Optisol GS相比,在陈培养基中储存后的角膜温度逆转。
Cornea. 2001 Jul;20(5):501-4. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200107000-00012.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density and morphology with Optisol GS and Life4C storage media in the eye bank: a 5-year retrospective analysis.眼库中使用Optisol GS和Life4C储存介质对角膜内皮细胞密度和形态的比较:一项5年回顾性分析。
Eye Bank Corneal Transpl. 2023 Dec;2(4). doi: 10.1097/ebct.0000000000000019. Epub 2023 Dec 18.