• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性别确认阴道成形术前的生殖器发育不全:机器人腹膜瓣法是否能产生等效的阴道管结果?

Genital Hypoplasia before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Does the Robotic Peritoneal Flap Method Create Equivalent Vaginal Canal Outcomes?

作者信息

Blasdel Gaines, Kloer Carmen, Parker Augustus, Shakir Nabeel, Zhao Lee C, Bluebond-Langner Rachel

机构信息

From the Department of Urology.

Duke University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):867-874. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010011. Epub 2022 Dec 9.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000010011
PMID:36729740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Insufficient genital tissue has been reported as a barrier to achieving depth in gender-affirming vaginoplasty. The authors sought to characterize vaginal depth and revision outcomes in patients with genital hypoplasia undergoing robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty.

METHODS

Retrospective case-control analysis of patients undergoing robotic peritoneal vaginoplasty between September of 2017 and August of 2020 was used. All 43 patients identified as having genital hypoplasia (genital length <7 cm) were included with 49 random controls from the remaining patients with greater than 7 cm genital length. Baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative variables were recorded to identify potential confounders. Outcomes measured included vaginal size reported at last visit and undergoing revision surgery for depth or for vulvar appearance.

RESULTS

Patients were well matched other than median body mass index at the time of surgery, which was greater in the hypoplasia cohort by 3.6 kg/m 2 ( P < 0.0001). Patients had a median of 1-year of follow-up, with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. No significant differences in outcomes were observed, with a median vaginal depth of 14.5 cm (interquartile range, 13.3 to 14.5 cm), and a median width of dilator used of 3.8 cm (interquartile range, 3.8 to 3.8 cm). No depth revisions were observed, and an 11% ( n = 10) rate of external revision occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with genital hypoplasia had equivalent dilation outcomes in a case-control analysis with consistent follow-up past 90 days. The robotic peritoneal flap vaginoplasty technique provides vaginal depth of 14 cm or greater regardless of genital tissue before surgery. Further investigation with patient-reported outcome measures is warranted.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

摘要

背景

据报道,生殖器组织不足是在性别确认阴道成形术中实现深度的一个障碍。作者试图对接受机器人腹膜瓣阴道成形术的生殖器发育不全患者的阴道深度和修复结果进行特征描述。

方法

采用回顾性病例对照分析,纳入2017年9月至2020年8月期间接受机器人腹膜阴道成形术的患者。所有43例被确定为生殖器发育不全(生殖器长度<7 cm)的患者被纳入研究,并从其余生殖器长度大于7 cm的患者中随机选取49例作为对照。记录基线临床特征和围手术期变量以识别潜在的混杂因素。测量的结果包括最后一次随访时报告的阴道大小以及因深度或外阴外观而接受修复手术的情况。

结果

除手术时的中位体重指数外,患者在其他方面匹配良好,发育不全队列中的中位体重指数比对照组高3.6 kg/m²(P<0.0001)。患者的中位随访时间为1年,最短随访时间为90天。未观察到结果有显著差异,中位阴道深度为14.5 cm(四分位间距,13.3至14.5 cm),使用的扩张器中位宽度为3.8 cm(四分位间距,3.8至3.8 cm)。未观察到深度修复,外部修复率为11%(n = 10)。

结论

在一项病例对照分析中,生殖器发育不全的患者在90天以上的持续随访中具有相同的扩张结果。机器人腹膜瓣阴道成形术技术无论术前生殖器组织如何,均可提供14 cm或更大的阴道深度。有必要采用患者报告的结局指标进行进一步研究。

临床问题/证据水平:风险,II级。

相似文献

1
Genital Hypoplasia before Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty: Does the Robotic Peritoneal Flap Method Create Equivalent Vaginal Canal Outcomes?性别确认阴道成形术前的生殖器发育不全:机器人腹膜瓣法是否能产生等效的阴道管结果?
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Apr 1;151(4):867-874. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010011. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
2
Robotic Peritoneal Flap Revision of Gender Affirming Vaginoplasty: a Novel Technique for Treating Neovaginal Stenosis.机器人辅助腹膜瓣修复术在性别肯定性阴道成形术中的应用:一种治疗新阴道狭窄的新方法。
Urology. 2021 Aug;154:308-314. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.03.024. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
3
Skin Management During Robotic Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Penoscrotal Hypoplasia Secondary to Pubertal Suppression.皮肤管理在机器人辅助经皮阴囊皮瓣阴道成形术中的应用 青春期抑制所致的阴-阴囊发育不全
Urology. 2023 Mar;173:226-227. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.12.020. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
4
Robotic Davydov Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty for Augmentation of Vaginal Depth in Feminizing Vaginoplasty.机器人辅助 Davydov 腹膜瓣阴道成形术在女性化阴道成形术中增加阴道深度。
J Urol. 2019 Jun;201(6):1171-1176. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000107.
5
Single Port and Multiport Approaches for Robotic Vaginoplasty With the Davydov Technique.单端口和多端口入路经阴道机器人 Davydov 成形术。
Urology. 2020 Apr;138:166-173. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.043. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Gender-affirming vaginoplasty: Technical considerations in patients with genital skin deficiency.性别肯定性阴道成形术:生殖器皮肤缺陷患者的技术考虑。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Jun;42(5):947-955. doi: 10.1002/nau.25091. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
The robotic-assisted free jejunal flap for neovaginal canal creation in gender-affirming vaginoplasties.机器人辅助游离空肠瓣在性别肯定性阴道成形术中用于新阴道腔的创建。
Microsurgery. 2024 Jul;44(5):e31202. doi: 10.1002/micr.31202.
8
Robotic Peritoneal Flap vs. Perineal Penile Inversion Techniques for Gender-Affirming Vaginoplasty.机器人辅助腹膜瓣与会阴阴茎倒置技术在性别肯定性阴道成形术中的应用比较。
Curr Urol Rep. 2022 Oct;23(10):211-218. doi: 10.1007/s11934-022-01106-9. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
9
Mending the Gap: AlloDerm as a Safe and Effective Option for Vaginal Canal Lining in Revision Robotic Assisted Gender Affirming Peritoneal Flap Vaginoplasty.弥合差距:AlloDerm 作为修复机器人辅助性别肯定性腹膜瓣阴道成形术中阴道管衬里的安全有效选择。
Urology. 2023 Mar;173:204-208. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
10
Does Depth Matter? Factors Affecting Choice of Vulvoplasty Over Vaginoplasty as Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery for Transgender Women.深度是否重要?影响跨性别女性性别肯定性生殖器手术中选择阴阜成形术而非阴道成形术的因素。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):902-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.03.085. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing sexual outcomes and complications in Male-to-Female Gender-Affirming Surgery: penile inversion vs. robotic peritoneal vaginoplasty.男性变女性性别确认手术中的性结局与并发症比较:阴茎反转术与机器人腹膜阴道成形术
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Sep 6. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01157-9.
2
Orchiectomy and scrotectomy as genital gender-affirming surgery: novel surgical technique and patient-reported outcomes.睾丸切除术和阴囊切除术作为性别肯定性生殖器手术:新的手术技术及患者报告的结果
BMC Urol. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01867-8.
3
The role of the surgical robot in gender-affirming surgery: a scoping review.
手术机器人在性别确认手术中的作用:一项范围综述。
Ther Adv Urol. 2025 May 14;17:17562872251336639. doi: 10.1177/17562872251336639. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
Recent Advancements in Robotic-assisted Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Systematic Review.机器人辅助整形手术的最新进展:一项系统综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Jan 23;13(1):e6476. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006476. eCollection 2025 Jan.
5
The emerging role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人技术在整形和重建外科中的新兴作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 15;18(1):254. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01987-7.
6
Robotics in Gender Affirming Surgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.性别肯定手术中的机器人技术:当前应用与未来方向
Semin Plast Surg. 2023 Aug 3;37(3):193-198. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771302. eCollection 2023 Aug.