Clinical Outcomes With and Without Plasma Exchange in the Treatment of Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) develops highly fatal, rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). Treatment strategies consist of glucocorticoid and adjunctive immunosuppressive therapies. Plasma exchange (PE) is an alternative therapy, but its benefit is unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine whether PE benefited outcomes for patients with RP-ILD.

METHODS

In this medical records review study, we compared baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes for 2 groups of patients with IIM-related RP-ILD: those who received and did not receive PE.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 15 patients, 9 of whom received PE. Baseline demographic characteristics and severity of lung, skin, and musculoskeletal disease between the 2 groups of patients were not significantly different. Five patients required mechanical ventilation (2, PE; 3, no PE). Plasma exchange was generally a third-line adjunctive treatment option. The PE group had a longer median (interquartile range) hospitalization (27.0 [23.0-36.0] days) than the non-PE group (12.0 [8.0-14.0] days) ( p = 0.02). There was a potential benefit in 30-day mortality improvement in those receiving PE (0% vs 33%, p = 0.14), with a statistically significant improvement in 2 important composite end points including 30-day mortality or need for lung transplant (0% vs 50%, p = 0.04) and 1-year mortality or need for lung transplant or hospital readmission for RP-ILD in those receiving PE (22% vs 83%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma exchange may be an underutilized, safe salvage therapy for patients with IIM-related RP-ILD when other immunosuppressive therapies fail.