Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Aug 1;47(4):350-357. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000188. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
Shoulder bracing is very common in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
In this study, the positioning efficacy of shoulder support braces was investigated by analyzing their three-dimensional kinematic properties, as well as their perceived comfort was investigated with user ratings.
A randomized repeated-measures study.
Seventeen asymptomatic participants were included. Scapular, humeral, and thoracic kinematics for all participants were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device in 6 experiments in randomized order: no brace, neutral brace, abduction brace, internal rotation brace, 15-degree external rotation brace (ER15-B), and 30-degree external rotation brace (ER30-B). Also, comfort ratings were obtained during each session.
Internal rotation brace achieved a mean of 29.34° of humerothoracic internal rotation while providing increased scapular internal rotation and upward rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace achieved a mean of 45.39° of humerothoracic and 39.58° of glenohumeral elevation coupled with increased scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral internal rotation ( p < 0.05). 30-Degree external rotation brace achieved a mean of 33.25° of glenohumeral external rotation and resulted in increased scapular external rotation, upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral external rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace, internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B moved the thoracic spine into a more axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B were rated more uncomfortable when compared with the no brace condition, with no significant differences observed among the braces.
The positioning efficacy was enhanced when an abduction pillow and external rotation wedge were applied. Selection of commercially available shoulder support braces should involve consideration of whether it can achieve the desired position and orientation as well as its comfort profile.
肩部支撑带在肌肉骨骼康复中非常常见。
通过分析三维运动学特性,研究肩部支撑带的定位效果,并通过用户评分研究其感知舒适度。
随机重复测量研究。
纳入 17 名无症状参与者。使用电磁跟踪装置在 6 个随机顺序的实验中测量所有参与者的肩胛骨、肱骨和胸廓运动:无支撑带、中立支撑带、外展支撑带、内旋支撑带、15 度外旋支撑带(ER15-B)和 30 度外旋支撑带(ER30-B)。同时,在每次试验中还获得了舒适度评分。
内旋支撑带可实现肱骨胸廓内旋 29.34°,同时增加肩胛骨内旋和上旋(p<0.05)。外展支撑带可实现肱骨胸廓和肩胛胸壁抬高 45.39°和 39.58°,同时增加肩胛骨上旋、后倾和肱骨内旋(p<0.05)。30 度外旋支撑带可实现肩肱外旋 33.25°,同时增加肩胛骨外旋、上旋、后倾和肱骨外旋(p<0.05)。外展支撑带、内旋支撑带、ER15-B 和 ER30-B 使胸椎向对侧轴向旋转。与无支撑带相比,内旋支撑带、ER15-B 和 ER30-B 的舒适度评分更高,但支撑带之间无显著差异。
应用外展垫和外旋楔形垫可增强定位效果。选择市售的肩部支撑带应考虑其能否达到预期的位置和方向以及舒适度。