• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索成年外科手术患者术后持续使用阿片类药物的发生率及风险因素:一项系统评价方案

Exploring incidence and risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use in adult surgical patients: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Griffiths Harry, Kent Bridie, Martin Daniel

机构信息

Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.

The University of Plymouth Centre for Innovations in Health and Social Care: A JBI Centre of Excellence, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, Devon, UK.

出版信息

JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Apr 1;21(4):805-811. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00106.

DOI:10.11124/JBIES-22-00106
PMID:36730288
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to determine the incidence of persistent postsurgical use of opioids in adult patients and the associated risk factors.

INTRODUCTION

Surgery has been identified as an independent risk factor for unwarranted chronic opioid use, contributing to opioid-related harm in the community. Persistent opioid use after surgery is associated with morbidity and mortality from opioid-related adverse events, indicating a significant yet mitigable public health concern. There is substantial variation in the reported incidence and risk factors for postoperative opioid use, which require evaluation for future evidence-based risk-reduction strategies.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

This review will include studies investigating the persistent use of opioids after 90 postoperative days in adult (≥18 y) patients undergoing surgery of any type, including patients with cancer pain. Selected evidence must report on opioid use prior to surgery. Analytical and descriptive observational studies, and experimental and quasi-experimental studies, published in the previous decade will be eligible for inclusion.

METHODS

The proposed study methods follow the JBI methodology for systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence. A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science, and a search of gray literature will include Google Scholar and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection, critical appraisal, and data extraction will be performed by 2 independent reviewers aided by the relevant JBI systematic review tools. We aim to produce a narrative synthesis of results and conduct a meta-analysis where feasible, in addition to subgroup analyses of suitable populations. The results are intended to promote safe, evidence-based postoperative opioid prescribing when considering risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42022320691.

摘要

目的

本综述的目的是确定成年患者术后持续使用阿片类药物的发生率及相关危险因素。

引言

手术已被确定为无必要长期使用阿片类药物的独立危险因素,会导致社区中与阿片类药物相关的危害。术后持续使用阿片类药物与阿片类药物相关不良事件的发病率和死亡率有关,这表明这是一个重大但可缓解的公共卫生问题。术后阿片类药物使用的报告发生率和危险因素存在很大差异,需要进行评估以制定未来基于证据的风险降低策略。

纳入标准

本综述将包括对任何类型手术的成年(≥18岁)患者术后90天持续使用阿片类药物的研究,包括癌症疼痛患者。所选证据必须报告术前的阿片类药物使用情况。过去十年发表的分析性和描述性观察性研究以及实验性和半实验性研究均符合纳入条件。

方法

拟采用的研究方法遵循JBI关于患病率和发病率系统评价的方法。将在PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane Central和Web of Science中进行系统检索,对灰色文献的检索将包括谷歌学术和ClinicalTrials.gov。研究选择、批判性评价和数据提取将由2名独立评审员借助相关的JBI系统评价工具进行。我们旨在对结果进行叙述性综合,并在可行的情况下进行荟萃分析,此外还将对合适人群进行亚组分析。研究结果旨在在考虑术后持续使用阿片类药物的危险因素时,促进安全、基于证据的术后阿片类药物处方。

系统评价注册号

PROSPERO CRD42022320691。

相似文献

1
Exploring incidence and risk factors for persistent postoperative opioid use in adult surgical patients: a systematic review protocol.探索成年外科手术患者术后持续使用阿片类药物的发生率及风险因素:一项系统评价方案
JBI Evid Synth. 2023 Apr 1;21(4):805-811. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-22-00106.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Relative frequency and risk factors for long-term opioid therapy following surgery and trauma among adults: a systematic review protocol.成人术后和创伤后长期使用阿片类药物治疗的相对频率和危险因素:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 18;7(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0760-3.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Risk of infections among persons treated with opioids for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.慢性疼痛接受阿片类药物治疗人群的感染风险:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 15;14(10):e083791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083791.
6
Treatment outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder initiated by prescription: a systematic review protocol.处方起始的阿片类药物使用障碍患者的治疗结局:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0682-0.
7
Postoperative pain and pain management and neurocognitive outcomes after non-cardiac surgery: a protocol for a series of systematic reviews.非心脏手术后的术后疼痛和疼痛管理及神经认知结局:一系列系统评价的方案。
Syst Rev. 2022 Dec 24;11(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02156-3.
8
Adverse outcomes associated with opioid prescription for acute low back pain: a systematic review protocol.与阿片类药物治疗急性腰痛相关的不良结局:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;6(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0556-x.
9
Opioid prescribing for acute postoperative pain: an overview of systematic reviews related to two consensus statements relevant at patient, prescriber, system and public health levels.阿片类药物用于急性术后疼痛的处方:与患者、处方者、系统和公共卫生层面相关的两个共识声明的系统评价概述。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Aug 30;23(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02243-5.
10
Preoperative opioid use and complications following total joint replacement: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.术前使用阿片类药物与全关节置换术后并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 16;10(6):e035377. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035377.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing psychiatric risk with a focus on optimizing patient satisfaction with penile prosthesis placement-a narrative review.以优化阴茎假体植入患者满意度为重点评估精神风险——一项叙述性综述。
Transl Androl Urol. 2023 Nov 30;12(11):1761-1771. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-144. Epub 2023 Nov 7.