• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与阿片类药物治疗急性腰痛相关的不良结局:系统评价方案。

Adverse outcomes associated with opioid prescription for acute low back pain: a systematic review protocol.

机构信息

Juravinski Hospital, Hamilton Health Sciences, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON, L8V 1C1, Canada.

Mood Disorders Research Unit, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3K7, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;6(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0556-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0556-x
PMID:28807047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5557568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute low back pain (ALBP) is the top cause of global disability, demonstrating a significant impact on individuals and society and demanding the need for appropriate management. There is a trend towards an increasing number of opioid prescriptions for ALBP despite the lack of investigation for its various short- and long-term outcomes. The objective of this review is to examine adverse outcomes associated with opioid use for ALBP.

METHODS/DESIGN: Using a search strategy, the search will be conducted using the following electronic databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the National Institutes for Health Clinical Trials Registry and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). We will include randomized clinical trials and observational studies investigating the impact of opioid use in ALBP in the adult population. All phases of screening, data extraction and assessment of methodological quality will be performed by two independent reviewers. We will perform quality and risk of bias assessment for the included articles and compare high and low risk of bias with a sensitivity analysis. We will conduct random- and fixed-effects meta-analyses with heterogeneity calculated using the I statistic and evaluate publication bias.

DISCUSSION

There are current guidelines published to alert clinicians in prescribing opioids for ALBP due to its likelihood of misuse, yet there is little change in prescribing patterns. To date, there is an absence of systematic information about the outcomes of prescription opioid in patients with ALBP. We will address this gap by providing evidence that will be useful for clinical practice.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42016033090.

摘要

背景

急性腰痛(ALBP)是全球残疾的首要原因,对个人和社会都有重大影响,需要进行适当的管理。尽管缺乏对各种短期和长期结果的研究,但开具阿片类药物处方治疗 ALBP 的趋势却在增加。本综述的目的是研究阿片类药物治疗 ALBP 相关的不良结局。

方法/设计:使用搜索策略,将在以下电子数据库中进行搜索:PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆、美国国立卫生研究院临床试验注册处和世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台(WHO ICTRP)。我们将纳入调查阿片类药物治疗成人 ALBP 影响的随机临床试验和观察性研究。所有筛选、数据提取和方法学质量评估阶段均由两名独立评审员进行。我们将对纳入的文章进行质量和偏倚风险评估,并与敏感性分析比较高风险和低风险。我们将进行随机和固定效应荟萃分析,并使用 I 统计量计算异质性,评估发表偏倚。

讨论

目前已经发布了指南,提醒临床医生在开具阿片类药物治疗 ALBP 时要注意药物滥用的可能性,但处方模式几乎没有改变。迄今为止,关于阿片类药物处方治疗 ALBP 患者的结局,尚无系统信息。我们将通过提供对临床实践有用的证据来解决这一差距。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42016033090。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8354/5557568/99c130130ed7/13643_2017_556_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8354/5557568/99c130130ed7/13643_2017_556_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8354/5557568/99c130130ed7/13643_2017_556_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adverse outcomes associated with opioid prescription for acute low back pain: a systematic review protocol.与阿片类药物治疗急性腰痛相关的不良结局:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 14;6(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0556-x.
2
Adverse Outcomes Associated with Prescription Opioids for Acute Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与急性腰痛患者使用处方类阿片类药物相关的不良结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Physician. 2019 Mar;22(2):119-138.
3
A Systematic Review of Interventions and Programs Targeting Appropriate Prescribing of Opioids.针对阿片类药物合理处方的干预措施和项目的系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 May;22(3):229-240.
4
Treatment outcomes in patients with opioid use disorder initiated by prescription: a systematic review protocol.处方起始的阿片类药物使用障碍患者的治疗结局:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 25;7(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0682-0.
5
Harms and benefits of opioids for management of non-surgical acute and chronic low back pain: a systematic review.阿片类药物在非手术性急性和慢性下背痛管理中的危害和益处:系统评价。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):664. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099805. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
6
The impact of chronic pain on opioid addiction treatment: a systematic review protocol.慢性疼痛对阿片类药物成瘾治疗的影响:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 16;4:49. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0042-2.
7
Prevalence, predictors and trends of opioid prescribing for lower back pain in United States emergency departments.美国急诊室下腰痛阿片类药物处方的流行率、预测因素和趋势。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Jun;46(3):698-704. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13324. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Prescriber Education Interventions to Optimize Opioid Prescribing in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.优化急性护理中阿片类药物处方的处方教育干预措施:系统评价。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E551-E562.
9
The impact of chiropractic care on prescription opioid use for non-cancer spine pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.脊骨疗法对非癌症脊柱疼痛患者处方类阿片类药物使用的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 12;13(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02654-6.
10
[Patterns of prescription of opioid analgesics in Hôtel-Dieu de France of Beyrouth].[贝鲁特法国主宫医院阿片类镇痛药的处方模式]
Encephale. 2016 Dec;42(6):511-516. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Nursing's Contribution to the Management of Patients with Pain and Opioid Misuse.护理在疼痛和阿片类药物滥用患者管理中的作用:范围综述
Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Feb;22(1):58-68. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain.阿片类药物治疗与慢性非癌性疼痛指南。
CMAJ. 2017 May 8;189(18):E659-E666. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170363.
2
Sex differences in substance use, health, and social functioning among opioid users receiving methadone treatment: a multicenter cohort study.接受美沙酮治疗的阿片类药物使用者在物质使用、健康和社会功能方面的性别差异:一项多中心队列研究。
Biol Sex Differ. 2015 Nov 10;6:21. doi: 10.1186/s13293-015-0038-6. eCollection 2015.
3
Opioids for low back pain.用于治疗腰痛的阿片类药物。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 5;350:g6380. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6380.
4
The burden of premature opioid-related mortality.过早出现的与阿片类药物相关的死亡负担。
Addiction. 2014 Sep;109(9):1482-8. doi: 10.1111/add.12598. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
5
Sex differences in outcomes of methadone maintenance treatment for opioid addiction: a systematic review protocol.阿片类药物成瘾美沙酮维持治疗结局的性别差异:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2014 May 16;3:45. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-45.
6
Random-effects meta-analysis of inconsistent effects: a time for change.随机效应荟萃分析不一致效应:变革的时机。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18;160(4):267-70. doi: 10.7326/M13-2886.
7
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
8
A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how.临床试验中的敏感性分析教程:内容、原因、时机和方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Jul 16;13:92. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-92.
9
Addressing continuous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.处理从试验分析中排除的参与者的连续数据:系统评价者指南。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;66(9):1014-1021.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Jun 15.
10
Addressing dichotomous data for participants excluded from trial analysis: a guide for systematic reviewers.针对从试验分析中排除的参与者的二分数据进行处理:系统评价者指南。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057132. Epub 2013 Feb 25.