Kay Anthony D, Baxter Brett A, Hill Mathew W, Blazevich Anthony J
Centre for Physical Activity and Life Sciences, Faculty of Art, Science and Technology, University of Northampton, Northamptonshire, UNITED KINGDOM.
Centre for Sport, Exercise and Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Coventry University, Warwickshire, UNITED KINGDOM.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2023 Apr 1;55(4):710-721. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003085. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
Substantial increases in joint range of motion (ROM) have been reported after eccentric resistance training; however, between-study variability and sample size issues complicate the interpretation of the magnitude of effect.
PubMed, Medline, and SPORTDiscus databases were searched for studies examining the effects of eccentric training on lower-limb passive joint ROM in healthy human participants. Meta-analysis used an inverse-variance random-effects model to calculate the pooled standardized difference (Hedge's g ) with 95% confidence intervals.
Meta-analysis of 22 ROM outcomes (17 studies, 376 participants) revealed a large increase in lower-limb passive joint ROM ( g = 0.86 (95% confidence intervals, 0.65-1.08)). Subgroup analyses revealed a moderate increase after 4-5 wk ( g = 0.63 (0.27-0.98)), large increase after 6-8 wk ( g = 0.98 (0.73-1.24)), and moderate increase after 9-14 wk ( g = 0.75 (0.03, 1.46)) of training. Large increases were found in dorsiflexion ( g = 1.12 (0.78-1.47)) and knee extension ( g = 0.82 (0.48-1.17)), but a small increase in knee flexion was observed ( g = 0.41 (0.05-0.77)). A large increase was found after isokinetic ( g = 1.07 (0.59-1.54)) and moderate increase after isotonic ( g = 0.77 (0.56-0.99)) training.
These findings demonstrate the potential of eccentric training as an effective flexibility training intervention and provide evidence for "best practice" guidelines. The larger effect after isokinetic training despite <50% training sessions being performed is suggestive of a more effective exercise mode, although further research is needed to determine the influence of contraction intensity and to confirm the efficacy of eccentric training in clinical populations.
有报道称,进行离心阻力训练后关节活动范围(ROM)显著增加;然而,研究之间的差异以及样本量问题使得对训练效果大小的解读变得复杂。
检索了PubMed、Medline和SPORTDiscus数据库,查找有关离心训练对健康人类参与者下肢被动关节ROM影响的研究。荟萃分析采用逆方差随机效应模型计算合并标准化差异(Hedge's g)及95%置信区间。
对22项ROM结果(17项研究,376名参与者)的荟萃分析显示,下肢被动关节ROM大幅增加(g = 0.86(95%置信区间,0.65 - 1.08))。亚组分析显示,训练4 - 5周后有中度增加(g = 0.63(0.27 - 0.98)),6 - 8周后大幅增加(g = 0.98(0.73 - 1.24)),9 - 14周后中度增加(g = 0.75(0.03,1.46))。背屈(g = 1.12(0.78 - 1.47))和膝关节伸展(g = 0.82(0.48 - 1.17))有大幅增加,但膝关节屈曲仅有小幅增加(g = 0.41(0.05 - 0.77))。等速训练后有大幅增加(g = 1.07(0.59 - 1.54)),等张训练后有中度增加(g = 0.77(0.56 - 0.99))。
这些发现证明了离心训练作为一种有效的柔韧性训练干预措施的潜力,并为“最佳实践”指南提供了证据。尽管进行的训练课程不到50%,但等速训练后的效果更大,这表明其是一种更有效的运动模式,不过还需要进一步研究来确定收缩强度的影响,并确认离心训练在临床人群中的疗效。