Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2023 Jul 1;42(4):353-363. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000898. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
Incorporation of molecular classification into clinicopathologic assessment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) improves risk stratification. Four EC molecular subtypes, as identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas, can be diagnosed through a validated algorithm Pro active M olecular R is k Classifier for E ndometrial Cancer (ProMisE) using p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC), and DNA polymerase epsilon ( POLE) mutational testing. Cost and access are major barriers to universal testing, particularly POLE analysis. We assessed a selective ProMisE algorithm (ProMisE-S): p53 and MMR IHC on all EC's with POLE testing restricted to those with abnormal MMR or p53 IHC (to identify POLEmut EC with secondary abnormalities in MMR and/or p53) and those with high-grade or non-endometrioid morphology, stage >IA or presence of lymphovascular space invasion (so as to avoid testing on the lowest risk tumors). We retrospectively compared the known ProMisE molecular classification to ProMisE-S in 912 EC. We defined a group of "very low-risk" EC (G1/G2, endometrioid, MMR-proficient, p53 wild-type, stage IA, no lymphovascular space invasion) in whom POLE testing will not impact on patient care; using ProMisE-S, POLE testing would not be required in 55% of biopsies and 38% of all EC's, after evaluation of the hysterectomy specimen, in a population-based cohort. "Very low-risk" endometrioid EC with unknown POLE status showed excellent clinical outcomes. Fifteen of 166 (9%) of all p53abn EC showed G1/G2 endometrioid morphology, supporting the potential value of universal p53 IHC. The addition of molecular testing changed the risk category in 89/896 (10%) EC's. In routine practice, POLE testing could be further restricted to only those patients in whom this would alter adjuvant therapy recommendations.
将分子分类纳入子宫内膜癌(EC)的临床病理评估可改善风险分层。通过经过验证的算法 Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer(ProMisE),可以通过 p53 和错配修复(MMR)蛋白免疫组织化学(IHC)以及 DNA 聚合酶 epsilon(POLE)突变检测来诊断由癌症基因组图谱确定的四种 EC 分子亚型。成本和可及性是普遍检测的主要障碍,特别是 POLE 分析。我们评估了一种选择性的 ProMisE 算法(ProMisE-S):所有 EC 均进行 p53 和 MMR IHC 检测,仅对 MMR 或 p53 IHC 异常的患者(以识别具有 MMR 和/或 p53 继发性异常的 POLEmut EC)以及具有高级别或非子宫内膜样形态、IA 期以上或存在脉管侵犯的患者(以避免对最低风险的肿瘤进行检测)进行 POLE 检测。我们回顾性比较了 912 例 EC 中已知的 ProMisE 分子分类与 ProMisE-S。我们定义了一组“极低风险”的 EC(G1/G2,子宫内膜样,MMR 正常,p53 野生型,IA 期,无脉管侵犯),在这些患者中,POLE 检测不会影响患者的治疗;在基于人群的队列中,对子宫切除术标本进行评估后,ProMisE-S 将不需要对 55%的活检和 38%的所有 EC 进行 POLE 检测。具有未知 POLE 状态的“极低风险”子宫内膜样 EC 显示出良好的临床结果。所有 p53abn EC 中有 166 例(9%)显示 G1/G2 子宫内膜样形态,支持普遍进行 p53 IHC 的潜在价值。分子检测的增加改变了 89/896(10%)例 EC 的风险类别。在常规实践中,POLE 检测可以进一步仅限于那些会改变辅助治疗建议的患者。