Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Jun;32(6S):S123-S131. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.023. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
The purpose of this study was to analyze the SHR of patients diagnosed with small (SRCTs) and massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs), adhesive capsulitis (AC), and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GH-OA) and compare their measurements to those of patient controls with healthy shoulders using DDR. We hypothesize that various diagnoses will vary with regards to SHR.
The sequences of pulsed radiographs collated in DDR to create a moving image were prospectively analyzed during humeral abduction in normal controls and in 4 distinct shoulder pathology groups: SRCT, MRCT, AC, and GH-OA. GH and ST joint angles were measured at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, 60°-90°, and maximal coronal plane humeral abduction. SHR was defined as the ratio of the change in humeral abduction over the change in scapula upward rotation during humeral abduction and was calculated within the above angle intervals.
A total of 121 shoulders were analyzed. Forty normal controls were compared to 13 SRCTs, 29 MRCTs, 16 AC, and 23 GH-OA. SHR during humeral abduction differed significantly in patients with MRCT (1.91 ± 0.72), AC (1.55 ± 0.37), and GH-OA (2.31 ± 1.01) compared to controls (3.39 ± 0.79). When analyzed across 30° intervals of abduction, there was a significantly lower SHR found at 0°-30°, 30°-60°, and 60°-90° in MRCT, AC, and GH-OA across each motion range compared to controls. Control patients had an arc of abduction of 103° ± 32°, which was significantly larger than all other pathologies (MRCT: 76° ± 23°, SRCT: 81° ± 21°, AC: 65° ± 27°, GH-OA: 71° ± 35°) and an average scapular abduction of 33° ± 14°, which was significantly less than patients with an MRCT (46° ± 10°) and AC (65° ± 27°).
SHR remained significantly lower throughout shoulder abduction in MRCT (43.65%), AC (-54.29%), and GH-OA (32.01%) compared to controls. When isolating for humeral and scapular motion, all 4 pathologies had decreased GH abduction, whereas AC and MRCT had an increased scapular compensatory motion compared to controls. Quantifying kinematic patterns like SHR using DDR can be implemented as a novel, safe, and cost-effective method to diagnose shoulder pathology and to monitor response to treatment.
本研究的目的是分析诊断为小(SRCTs)和大肩袖撕裂(MRCTs)、粘连性肩关节囊炎(AC)和肩肱关节炎(GH-OA)患者的 SHR,并将其与健康肩部的患者对照进行比较使用 DDR。我们假设各种诊断将在 SHR 方面有所不同。
前瞻性分析 DDR 中收集的脉冲射线照相序列,以创建运动图像,在正常对照者和 4 个不同的肩部病理组中进行肱骨外展:SRCT、MRCT、AC 和 GH-OA。在 0°-30°、30°-60°、60°-90°和最大冠状面肱骨外展时测量 GH 和 ST 关节角度。SHR 定义为肱骨外展过程中肱骨外展变化与肩胛骨向上旋转变化的比值,在上述角度间隔内计算。
共分析了 121 个肩膀。将 40 个正常对照者与 13 个 SRCT、29 个 MRCT、16 个 AC 和 23 个 GH-OA 进行比较。与对照组(3.39 ± 0.79)相比,MRCT(1.91 ± 0.72)、AC(1.55 ± 0.37)和 GH-OA(2.31 ± 1.01)患者的肱骨外展过程中的 SHR 差异有统计学意义。当按外展 30°间隔分析时,MRCT、AC 和 GH-OA 每个运动范围的 0°-30°、30°-60°和 60°-90°处的 SHR 明显低于对照组。对照组患者的外展弧为 103°±32°,明显大于其他所有病理学(MRCT:76°±23°,SRCT:81°±21°,AC:65°±27°,GH-OA:71°±35°)和肩胛骨外展的平均幅度为 33°±14°,明显小于 MRCT(46°±10°)和 AC(65°±27°)患者。
与对照组相比,MRCT(43.65%)、AC(-54.29%)和 GH-OA(32.01%)患者的 SHR 在整个肩部外展过程中均显著降低。当隔离肱骨和肩胛骨运动时,所有 4 种病理学均有 GH 外展减少,而 AC 和 MRCT 与对照组相比,肩胛骨的代偿性运动增加。使用 DDR 定量运动学模式(如 SHR)可以作为一种新颖、安全且具有成本效益的方法来诊断肩部病理学并监测治疗反应。