Division of Hand Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Hansjörg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Oct;49(10):1034.e1-1034.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
Data objectively comparing outcomes following pollicization versus toe-to-thumb transfer for reconstruction after traumatic thumb amputation in adults remains sparse. Given that this decision is reliant on personal preference, it is important to understand the subjective nature of these preferences, particularly in the context of culture. The purpose of this study was to compare Eastern and Western societal and hand surgeon preferences for pollicization versus toe-to-thumb transfer for traumatic thumb reconstruction.
Investigators from 6 international locations recruited local hand surgeons and members of the general population. Austria, Germany, the United States, and Spain were grouped as "Western" nations. China and India separately represented "Eastern" nations. Participants completed a questionnaire evaluating their personal preferences for pollicization and toe-to-thumb transfer. The questions posed to the general population and hand surgeons were identical. Demographic data were also collected.
When comparing the Western nations, China, and India, there was no difference in personal preferences within the general population for pollicization versus toe-to-thumb transfer. In contrast, most Indian hand surgeons favored toe-to-thumb transfer and most Western surgeons were uncertain about which procedure they would favor. Surgeons had more optimistic expectations regarding postoperative hand function, new thumb sensation, and hand appearance following pollicization than the general population. Similarly, for toe-to-thumb transfer, a greater proportion of surgeons predicted good-to-excellent function, sensation, and appearance.
There was no clear, observed "East" versus "West" difference in the general population's personal preferences for pollicization versus toe-to-thumb transfer among study participants. The members of the general population and hand surgeons had different outcome expectations.
Understanding how culture influences patient and hand surgeon preferences for pollicization versus toe-to-thumb transfer may help guide future decision-making for traumatic thumb reconstruction.
对于成人创伤性拇指截肢后重建,将拇指再造与足趾-拇指转移进行客观比较的数据仍然很少。由于这一决策依赖于个人偏好,因此了解这些偏好的主观性非常重要,尤其是在文化背景下。本研究的目的是比较东方和西方社会以及手部外科医生对手部创伤重建中拇指再造与足趾-拇指转移的偏好。
来自 6 个国际地点的调查员招募了当地手部外科医生和普通民众。奥地利、德国、美国和西班牙被归为“西方”国家。中国和印度分别代表“东方”国家。参与者完成了一份问卷,评估他们对拇指再造和足趾-拇指转移的个人偏好。向普通民众和手部外科医生提出的问题是相同的。还收集了人口统计学数据。
在比较西方国家、中国和印度时,普通民众对拇指再造与足趾-拇指转移的个人偏好没有差异。相比之下,大多数印度手部外科医生倾向于足趾-拇指转移,而大多数西方外科医生对他们更喜欢哪种手术犹豫不决。外科医生对拇指再造术后手部功能、新拇指感觉和手部外观的期望比普通民众更为乐观。同样,对于足趾-拇指转移,更多的外科医生预测功能、感觉和外观良好至优秀。
在研究参与者中,普通民众对拇指再造与足趾-拇指转移的个人偏好没有明显的“东方”与“西方”差异。普通民众和手部外科医生对手部手术结果的预期不同。
了解文化如何影响患者和手部外科医生对拇指再造与足趾-拇指转移的偏好,可能有助于指导未来创伤性拇指重建的决策。