Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences and Hearing Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Jan;153(1):274. doi: 10.1121/10.0016867.
The detectability of target amplitude modulation (AM) can be reduced by masker AM in the same carrier-frequency region. It can be reduced even further, however, if the masker-AM rate is uncertain [Conroy and Kidd, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 3665-3673 (2021)]. This study examined the effectiveness of contextual cues in reducing this latter, uncertainty-related effect (modulation informational masking). Observers were tasked with detecting fixed-rate target sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) in the presence of masker SAM applied simultaneously to the same broadband-noise carrier. A single-interval, two-alternative forced-choice detection procedure was used to measure sensitivity for the target SAM; masker-AM-rate uncertainty was created by randomly selecting the AM rate of the masker SAM on each trial. Relative to an uncued condition, a pretrial cue to the masker SAM significantly improved sensitivity for the target SAM; a cue to the target SAM, however, did not. The delay between the cue-interval offset and trial-interval onset did not affect the size of the masker-cue benefit, suggesting that adaptation of the masker SAM was not responsible. A simple model of within-AM-channel masking captured important trends in the psychophysical data, suggesting that reduced masker-AM-rate uncertainty may have played a relatively minor role in the masker-cue benefit.
目标调幅(AM)的可检测性会受到载波频率区域内掩蔽者 AM 的影响。然而,如果掩蔽者 AM 速率不确定,其可检测性甚至会进一步降低[Conroy 和 Kidd, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 149, 3665-3673 (2021)]。本研究考察了语境线索在降低这种与不确定性相关的效应(调制信息掩蔽)方面的有效性。在存在同时应用于相同宽带噪声载波的掩蔽者 SAM 的情况下,观察者的任务是检测固定速率的目标正弦 AM。使用单间隔、二选一强制选择检测程序来测量目标 SAM 的灵敏度;通过在每次试验中随机选择掩蔽者 SAM 的 AM 速率来创建掩蔽者 AM 速率不确定性。与未提示条件相比,掩蔽者 SAM 的预提示显著提高了目标 SAM 的灵敏度;然而,对目标 SAM 的提示并没有提高灵敏度。提示间隔结束和试验间隔开始之间的延迟不影响掩蔽者提示的好处的大小,这表明掩蔽者 SAM 的适应不是原因。AM 通道内掩蔽的简单模型捕捉到了心理物理数据中的重要趋势,表明降低掩蔽者 AM 速率不确定性可能在掩蔽者提示的好处中起相对较小的作用。