Moore B C, Glasberg B R
J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Apr;73(4):1249-59. doi: 10.1121/1.389273.
The first two experiments were designed to determine whether mutual suppression in broadband noise increases in strength with increasing overall level. In experiment I masking functions (signal threshold versus masker level) were measured in forward masking as a function of the delay time of a 10-ms signal, both for a broadband noise masker (low-pass filtered at 8 kHz) and for sinusoidal maskers at 1, 2 and 4 kHz. In the latter case the signal frequency equaled the masker frequency. For short signal delays the masking functions were steeper for the sinusoidal masker than for the noise masker. At longer delays the slopes for both masker types decreased and the slopes for the two masker types became more nearly equal. In experiment II we investigated the effect of gating a low-level noise cue with the sinusoidal masker. At the longer signal delays the masking functions had equal slopes for the broadband noise masker and the sinusoidal masker with cue. At short signal delays the masking functions for sinusoidal maskers may be "artificially" steepened, since the subject lacks an effective cue to distinguish the signal from the masker. The equal slopes at longer delays indicate that mutual suppression of the components within a broadband noise does not increase in strength with increasing overall level. In experiment III we attempted to estimate the magnitude of mutual suppression in a broadband noise by comparing masking functions for a broadband noise and for a noise whose bandwidth was 20% of the center frequency. The suppression was estimated to be about 2 dB at 4 kHz and 8 dB at 2 kHz. A simple mathematical expression, suggested by Jesteadt et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, 950-962 (1982)], was found to give an accurate description of the amount of masking produced by the broadband masker as a function of masker level and signal delay.
前两个实验旨在确定宽带噪声中的相互抑制强度是否会随着总声级的增加而增强。在实验I中,测量了前掩蔽中的掩蔽函数(信号阈值与掩蔽声级的关系),该函数是10毫秒信号延迟时间的函数,实验对象是宽带噪声掩蔽声(在8千赫处进行低通滤波)以及1千赫、2千赫和4千赫的正弦掩蔽声。在后一种情况下,信号频率与掩蔽声频率相等。对于短信号延迟,正弦掩蔽声的掩蔽函数比噪声掩蔽声的更陡峭。在较长延迟时,两种掩蔽声类型的斜率都减小了,并且两种掩蔽声类型的斜率变得更加接近相等。在实验II中,我们研究了用正弦掩蔽声对低电平噪声线索进行选通的效果。在较长信号延迟时,宽带噪声掩蔽声和带线索的正弦掩蔽声的掩蔽函数具有相等的斜率。在短信号延迟时,正弦掩蔽声的掩蔽函数可能会“人为地”变陡,因为受试者缺乏将信号与掩蔽声区分开的有效线索。较长延迟时的相等斜率表明,宽带噪声中各成分之间的相互抑制强度不会随着总声级的增加而增强。在实验III中,我们试图通过比较宽带噪声和带宽为中心频率20%的噪声的掩蔽函数,来估计宽带噪声中的相互抑制幅度。据估计,在4千赫时抑制约为2分贝,在2千赫时为8分贝。发现Jesteadt等人[《美国声学学会杂志》71, 950 - 962 (1982)]提出的一个简单数学表达式能够准确描述宽带掩蔽声产生的掩蔽量与掩蔽声声级和信号延迟的函数关系。