Bulguroglu Halil I, Bulguroglu Merve
Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara Medipol University, Ankara, Turkey.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023 Feb 2;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13102-023-00625-3.
BACKGROUND: Along with the covid-19 process, people started to turn to online exercise methods. One of these methods is the pilates method, which increases the endurance of the core muscles. This study aims to analyze and compare the effects of online and face-to-face pilates methods. METHODS: Fifty-eight healthy individuals aged 25-40 years were included in the study. Individuals were randomly divided into three groups; online pilates group (OPG), face-to-face pilates group (FPG), and control group (CG). Pilates groups were given pilates exercises in groups of three or four for eight weeks, three days a week, for 1 h a day, by the physiotherapist. The control group did breathing and relaxation exercises at home. Core muscular endurance, depression, and quality of life were assessed before and after eight weeks of training. RESULTS: Core muscle endurance, depression, and quality of life improved after pilates in online and face-to-face pilates groups (p < 0.05). No change was found in the control group (p > 0.05). When the gains in the Pilates groups were compared, it was seen that the improvement in the Modified Biering-Sorensen test was more significant in the face-to-face pilates group, and the improvement in the trunk flexion test was more significant in the online group (p < 0.05), while the gains in other parameters were similar (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: As a result, healthy individuals have seen similar benefits in online and face-to-face pilates. Both methods are significant for gaining healthy habits and increasing physical activity in healthy individuals. Trial registration Retrospectively registered. NCT05309486, Registration date: 04/04/2022. URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05309486?term=BULGUROGLU&draw=2&rank=1.
背景:随着新冠疫情的发展,人们开始转向在线锻炼方式。其中一种方法是普拉提方法,它可以增强核心肌肉的耐力。本研究旨在分析和比较在线普拉提方法与面对面普拉提方法的效果。 方法:58名年龄在25至40岁之间的健康个体被纳入研究。个体被随机分为三组;在线普拉提组(OPG)、面对面普拉提组(FPG)和对照组(CG)。普拉提组由物理治疗师以三到四人一组的形式进行为期八周的普拉提练习,每周三天,每天1小时。对照组在家进行呼吸和放松练习。在训练八周前后评估核心肌肉耐力、抑郁和生活质量。 结果:在线普拉提组和面对面普拉提组在进行普拉提练习后,核心肌肉耐力、抑郁和生活质量均有所改善(p < 0.05)。对照组未发现变化(p > 0.05)。比较普拉提组的改善情况时发现,改良比林-索伦森试验在面对面普拉提组中的改善更为显著,而躯干屈曲试验在在线组中的改善更为显著(p < 0.05),而其他参数的改善相似(p > 0.05)。 结论:结果表明,健康个体在在线普拉提和面对面普拉提中获得了相似的益处。两种方法对于健康个体养成健康习惯和增加身体活动都具有重要意义。试验注册 回顾性注册。NCT05309486,注册日期:2022年4月4日。网址:https://www.CLINICALTRIALS.gov/ct2/show/NCT05309486?term=BULGUROGLU&draw=2&rank=1 。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2023-2-2
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024-2-20
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016-10
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024-10-19
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024-2-20
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025-3-1
Front Digit Health. 2021-10-28
Complement Ther Med. 2018-2-13