Suppr超能文献

范畴模态实在论。

Categorial modal realism.

作者信息

Brunet Tyler D P

机构信息

Egenis, The Center for the Study of the Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Byrne House, St German's Road, Exeter, Devon EX4 4PJ UK.

Department Social and Political Sciences, Philosophy and Anthropology, University of Exeter, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter, EX4 4RJ UK.

出版信息

Synthese. 2023;201(2):49. doi: 10.1007/s11229-023-04042-4. Epub 2023 Jan 30.

Abstract

The current conception of the plurality of worlds is founded on a set theoretic understanding of possibilia. This paper provides an alternative category theoretic conception and argues that it is at least as serviceable for our understanding of possibilia. In addition to or instead of the notion of possibilia conceived as possible objects or possible individuals, this alternative to set theoretic modal realism requires the notion of possible morphisms, conceived as possible changes, processes or transformations. To support this alternative conception of the plurality of worlds, I provide two examples where a category theoretic account can do work traditionally done by the set theoretic account: one on modal logic and another on paradoxes of size. I argue that the categorial account works at least as well as the set theoretic account, and moreover suggest that it has something to add in each case: it makes apparent avenues of inquiry that were obscured, if not invisible, on the set theoretic account. I conclude with a plea for epistemological humility about our acceptance of either a category-like or set-like realist ontology of modality.

摘要

当前对于多个世界的理解基于对可能性事物的集合论理解。本文提出了一种替代性的范畴论理解,并认为它至少在我们对可能性事物的理解上同样有用。除了或替代将可能性事物视为可能对象或可能个体的概念之外,这种对集合论模态实在论的替代方案需要将可能态射的概念视为可能的变化、过程或转变。为了支持这种对多个世界的替代性理解,我给出了两个例子,在其中范畴论解释能够完成传统上由集合论解释所做的工作:一个是关于模态逻辑,另一个是关于规模悖论。我认为范畴论解释至少与集合论解释一样有效,而且还表明在每种情况下它都有额外的贡献:它揭示了在集合论解释下即使没有被完全忽视但也被模糊的探究途径。最后,我呼吁在接受类似范畴或类似集合的模态实在论本体论时保持认识论上的谦逊态度。

相似文献

1
Categorial modal realism.
Synthese. 2023;201(2):49. doi: 10.1007/s11229-023-04042-4. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Model-theoretic semantics and revenge paradoxes.
Philos Stud. 2019;176(4):1035-1054. doi: 10.1007/s11098-018-1041-7. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
3
Operational theories as structural realism.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2022 Aug;94:99-111. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
4
Critical Realism and Realist Inquiry in Medical Education.
Acad Med. 2020 Jul;95(7):984-988. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003232.
5
Realism, reliability, and epistemic possibility: on modally interpreting the Benacerraf-Field challenge.
Synthese. 2021;199(1-2):4415-4436. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02984-7. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
7
Brain networks, structural realism, and local approaches to the scientific realism debate.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2017 Aug;64:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 10.
8
Individuating Logics: A Category-Theoretic Approach.
Thought (Hoboken). 2019 Sep;8(3):200-208. doi: 10.1002/tht3.425. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
9
A Logical Modeling of Severe Ignorance.
J Philos Logic. 2023 Apr 11:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10992-022-09697-x.
10
Categorial compositionality II: universal constructions and a general theory of (quasi-)systematicity in human cognition.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002102. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Local causation.
Synthese. 2021;199(3-4):10885-10908. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03272-8. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
The metaphysics of evolution.
Interface Focus. 2017 Oct 6;7(5):20160148. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0148. Epub 2017 Aug 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验