• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦女性希望参与有危害且不能降低死亡率的乳腺癌筛查:一项横断面调查。

Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Social & Health Services and Labour Market, DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):403-416. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231152830. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1177/0272989X231152830
PMID:36734154
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Informed decision making is recommended in breast cancer screening. Decision aids with balanced information on harms and benefits are recommended to support informed decision making. However, informed screening decision making may be challenged by overly positive attitudes toward cancer screening. We hypothesized that a substantial proportion of Danish women would want to participate in screening regardless of the presented information. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the prevalence of Danish women wanting to participate in a hypothetical breast cancer screening offering no reduction in breast cancer mortality but potential harms related to unnecessary treatment.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study, we invited a random sample of 751 women in the nonscreening population aged 44 to 49 y in the Central Denmark Region to an online questionnaire using the official digital mailbox system. The questionnaire included a description of a hypothetical screening and questions about thoughts on breast cancer, health literacy, and questions on the assessment of the hypothetical screening including intended participation, understanding, and belief in information. Data were linked to register data on sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

In total, 43.0% (323/751) responded to the questionnaire. Of these, 247 (82.3% [95% confidence interval: 77.5-86.5]) wanted to participate in the hypothetical breast cancer screening (participation group). More than two-thirds in both the participation group and nonparticipation group seemed to understand the presented information. Half of the women who understood the information disbelieved it.

CONCLUSIONS

Exceeding our expectations, a majority of women wanted to participate in a hypothetical screening with potential harms but no reduction in breast cancer mortality. A large proportion understood but disbelieved the screening information. This could indicate that Danish women make their screening decisions based on beliefs rather than presented screening information. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04509063).

HIGHLIGHTS

The majority of Danish women wanted to participate in a hypothetical breast cancer screening with potential harms related to unnecessary treatment but no reduction in mortality.A large proportion of women understood but disbelieved the hypothetical screening information.Informed decision making may be challenging when women disbelieve the information they receive.Enthusiasm for cancer screening and potential disbelief in information are important factors when developing and improving screening information and invitation.

摘要

介绍

在乳腺癌筛查中推荐进行知情决策。建议使用具有危害和益处平衡信息的决策辅助工具来支持知情决策。然而,对癌症筛查的过度积极态度可能会对知情筛查决策构成挑战。我们假设丹麦有相当一部分女性无论提供何种信息都希望参加筛查。因此,我们旨在估计丹麦女性希望参加一种假设的乳腺癌筛查的比例,这种筛查不会降低乳腺癌死亡率,但可能会带来与不必要治疗相关的危害。

方法

在一项横断面研究中,我们通过丹麦中央大区的非筛查人群中年龄在 44 至 49 岁的随机抽样,邀请 751 名女性使用官方数字邮箱系统在线填写问卷。问卷包括对假设性筛查的描述,以及对乳腺癌、健康素养的看法,以及对假设性筛查的评估问题,包括参与意向、理解和对信息的信任。数据与社会人口因素登记数据相关联。

结果

共有 751 名女性中的 43.0%(323 名)回复了问卷。其中,247 名(82.3%[95%置信区间:77.5-86.5%])希望参加假设性乳腺癌筛查(参与组)。参与组和非参与组中超过三分之二的人似乎都理解了所提供的信息。理解信息的女性中有一半人不相信信息。

结论

出乎我们的意料,大多数女性希望参加一种具有潜在危害但不会降低乳腺癌死亡率的假设性筛查。相当一部分人理解但不相信筛查信息。这可能表明丹麦女性的筛查决策是基于信念而不是提供的筛查信息。本研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(标识符:NCT04509063)。

要点

大多数丹麦女性希望参加一种具有潜在危害的假设性乳腺癌筛查,这些危害与不必要的治疗有关,但不会降低死亡率。相当一部分女性理解但不相信假设性筛查信息。当女性不相信他们收到的信息时,知情决策可能会受到挑战。对癌症筛查的热情和对信息的潜在不信任是开发和改进筛查信息和邀请的重要因素。

相似文献

1
Danish Women Want to Participate in a Hypothetical Breast Cancer Screening with Harms and No Reduction in Mortality: A Cross-Sectional Survey.丹麦女性希望参与有危害且不能降低死亡率的乳腺癌筛查:一项横断面调查。
Med Decis Making. 2023 May;43(4):403-416. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231152830. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Oct 5(10):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3.
3
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
4
Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research.妊娠期和产褥期的血栓预防:一项系统评价和经济评估,以估算未来研究的价值。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Mar;28(9):1-176. doi: 10.3310/DFWT3873.
5
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
6
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
7
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
8
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk.乳腺 X 线摄影联合乳腺超声与乳腺 X 线摄影用于一般风险女性乳腺癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD009632. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009632.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Communicating the results of risk-based breast cancer screening through visualizations of risk: a participatory design approach.基于风险的乳腺癌筛查结果通过风险可视化呈现:一种参与式设计方法。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Mar 18;24(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02483-6.