Wang Jingjing, Lv Yuzhen, Wang XingLing, Zhu Guangli, Zhao Fang
Reproductive Medicine Center of Jiaozuo Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Jiaozuo, China.
Reproductive Medicine Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Mar;49(3):966-972. doi: 10.1111/jog.15534. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
The objective of this study was to examine the predictive ability of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)/luteinizing hormone (LH) ratio and antimullerian hormone (AMH) levels in the same cohort when both are inconsistent and to identify which has an excellent ability to predict live birth and ovarian response to in vitro fertilization (IVF).
A retrospective cohort study was performed within 6096 IVF cycles executed between January 2016 and August 2019 at the Center for Assisted Reproduction, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, and Jiaozuo Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital. Initially, IVF cycles were classified according to basal FSH/LH ratio and AMH values, and the primary outcome was a comparison of live birth rate per cohort. Secondary outcomes included characteristics of the study individuals such as body mass index (BMI), age, antral follicle count, ovarian sensitivity index, cycle cancellation rate, and cycle outcome data.
RESULT(S): Women with FSH/LH ratio and AMH levels had a meaningly higher live birth rate compared with those with FSH/LH ratio and AMH levels (46.59% vs. 21.21%, p < 0.001). In addition, women with FSH/LH ratio and AMH levels were found to have a higher cancellation rate in their IVF cycles (80.98%). In women with FSH/LH ratio, further multivariate analysis revealed that AMH level, age, number of retrieved oocytes, and FSH dosage were relevant risk factors for live birth. The relative risk of live birth was 0.11 (95% [CI] 0.06-0.20, p < 0.001) in patients with AMH compared with patients with AMH . It also suggested that the probability of AMH level may be higher as the women's age (≥35 years, odd ratio [OR] 1.94, 95% [CI] 1.44-2.61; p < 0.001) and increasing BMI (≥28 kg/m , OR 2.38, 95% [CI] 1.33-4.27; p = 0.004). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that AMH had higher sensitivity and specificity to predict live birth compared with FSH/LH (AUC 0.627 vs. 0.539).
CONCLUSION(S): AMH levels can be an excellent predictor of the discrepancy between FSH/LH ratio and AMH levels regarding living birth rates in women undergoing IVF.
本研究的目的是在同一队列中,当促卵泡生成素(FSH)/促黄体生成素(LH)比值和抗苗勒管激素(AMH)水平不一致时,检验它们的预测能力,并确定哪一项在预测体外受精(IVF)活产和卵巢反应方面具有卓越能力。
在郑州大学第三附属医院生殖医学中心和焦作市妇幼保健院于2016年1月至2019年8月进行的6096个IVF周期内开展一项回顾性队列研究。最初,根据基础FSH/LH比值和AMH值对IVF周期进行分类,主要结局是比较各队列的活产率。次要结局包括研究个体的特征,如体重指数(BMI)、年龄、窦卵泡计数、卵巢敏感性指数、周期取消率和周期结局数据。
FSH/LH比值和AMH水平正常的女性与FSH/LH比值和AMH水平异常的女性相比,活产率显著更高(46.59%对21.21%,p<0.001)。此外,发现FSH/LH比值和AMH水平正常的女性在其IVF周期中有更高的取消率(80.98%)。在FSH/LH比值异常的女性中,进一步的多因素分析显示,AMH水平、年龄、获卵数和FSH剂量是活产的相关危险因素。与AMH水平正常的患者相比,AMH水平异常的患者活产的相对风险为0.11(95%[CI]0.06 - 0.20,p<0.001)。这也表明,随着女性年龄增加(≥35岁,比值比[OR]1.94,95%[CI]1.44 - 2.61;p<0.001)和BMI增加(≥28kg/m²,OR 2.38,95%[CI]1.33 - 4.27;p = 0.004),AMH水平异常的概率可能更高。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,与FSH/LH相比,AMH在预测活产方面具有更高的敏感性和特异性(曲线下面积0.627对0.539)。
对于接受IVF的女性,AMH水平在预测FSH/LH比值与AMH水平不一致情况下的活产率方面可能是一个卓越的预测指标。