• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同一天由同一位外科医生施行两种腹腔镜结肠癌手术的可行性。

Feasibility of two laparoscopic surgeries for colon cancer performed by the same surgeon on a single day.

机构信息

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.

Clinical Research Center, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 3;38(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04325-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-023-04325-9
PMID:36735071
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the proportion of laparoscopic colectomies (LCs) for colon cancer is increasing, the feasibility of the same surgeon performing two LCs on a single day remains unknown. This study was conducted to clarify the feasibility of this practice by evaluating short-term and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis enrolled patients with pathological stage I-III colon cancer who underwent LC at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on the timing of the surgery for the surgeon. The first group (n = 1485) comprised patients who underwent LC as the first surgery of the day for the surgeon. The second group (n = 163) comprised patients who underwent LC as the second LC of the day for the surgeon. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the baseline characteristics of the first and second groups. The short-term and long-term outcomes of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo classification grade II or higher between the first (10.4%, 17/163) and second groups (5.5%, 9/163). There were no significant differences in other perioperative outcomes, including operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of conversion to open surgery, between the two groups. Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in overall survival or relapse-free survival between the two groups both in the full cohort and in the propensity score-matched cohort. In the propensity score-matched cohort, 5-year overall survival was 92.7% in the first group and 94.4% in the second group; 5-year relapse-free survival was 87.1% and 90.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the same surgeon performing two LCs for colon cancer on a single day is feasible in terms of short-term and long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管腹腔镜结肠切除术(LC)治疗结肠癌的比例在不断增加,但同一术者在同一天内完成两次 LC 的可行性仍不清楚。本研究旨在通过评估短期和长期结果来阐明这种做法的可行性。

方法

本回顾性分析纳入了 2010 年至 2020 年在静冈癌症中心接受 LC 治疗的病理分期 I-III 期结肠癌患者。根据术者手术时间将患者分为两组。第一组(n=1485)包括术者当天第一台手术为 LC 的患者。第二组(n=163)包括术者当天第二台 LC 为手术的患者。采用倾向评分匹配法平衡两组的基线特征。比较两组的短期和长期结果。

结果

在倾向评分匹配后,第一组(10.4%,17/163)和第二组(5.5%,9/163)术后并发症发生率 Clavien-Dindo 分级 II 级或以上无显著差异。两组间其他围手术期结果,包括手术时间、术中出血量和中转开腹率,均无显著差异。关于长期结果,两组在全队列和倾向评分匹配队列中,总生存率和无复发生存率均无显著差异。在倾向评分匹配队列中,第一组的 5 年总生存率为 92.7%,第二组为 94.4%;5 年无复发生存率分别为 87.1%和 90.3%。

结论

我们的结果表明,同一术者在同一天内为结肠癌行两次 LC 是可行的,且短期和长期结果均良好。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of two laparoscopic surgeries for colon cancer performed by the same surgeon on a single day.同一天由同一位外科医生施行两种腹腔镜结肠癌手术的可行性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Feb 3;38(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04325-9.
2
Short-term efficacy of transvaginal specimen extraction for right colon cancer based on propensity score matching: A retrospective cohort study.基于倾向评分匹配的经阴道标本提取对右半结肠癌短期疗效的回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.07.025. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Oncological outcomes following laparoscopic surgery for pathological T4 colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜手术治疗病理 T4 期结肠癌的肿瘤学结局:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Today. 2021 Mar;51(3):404-414. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02106-3. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
4
The usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a single-center, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.内镜手术技能资格认证系统在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的应用:单中心回顾性分析及倾向评分匹配研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 16;408(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02810-x.
5
Inferior versus medial approach in laparoscopic colectomy with complete mesocolic excision and D3 lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancer: A propensity-score-matched analysis.完全结肠系膜切除及D3淋巴结清扫的腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术中下侧入路与内侧入路的倾向评分匹配分析
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan;25(1):56-65. doi: 10.1111/codi.16327. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
Reevaluation of laparoscopic surgery's value in pathological T4 colon cancer with comparison to open surgery: A retrospective and propensity score-matched study.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗病理 T4 期结肠癌的价值再评估:一项回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 May;53:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Long-term Outcomes of Single-Site Laparoscopic Colectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision for Colon Cancer: Comparison With Conventional Multiport Laparoscopic Colectomy Using Propensity Score Matching.单部位腹腔镜完整结肠系膜切除术治疗结肠癌的长期疗效:与传统多端口腹腔镜结肠切除术使用倾向评分匹配法的比较
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000810.
8
Impact of prior abdominal surgery on short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched analysis.既往腹部手术对腹腔镜结直肠癌手术后近期结局的影响:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jun;36(6):4429-4441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08794-3. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer: A multicenter propensity score-matched analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术治疗右半结肠癌的近期和远期疗效:多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Jul;15(3):547-554. doi: 10.1111/ases.13045. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
10
[Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].基于倾向评分匹配的机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术临床疗效的比较研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 1;57(6):447-451. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2019.06.010.

本文引用的文献

1
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
Clinical impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) by Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (JSES) for laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and low anterior resection based on the National Clinical Database (NCD) registry.日本内镜外科学会(JSES)的内镜手术技能资格认定系统(ESSQS)基于国家临床数据库(NCD)登记,对腹腔镜远端胃切除术和低位前切除术的临床影响。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Aug 31;4(6):721-734. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12384. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Evaluating the Regional Uptake of Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: a Report from the Surgical Care Outcomes Assessment Program.评估微创结直肠手术的区域普及度:外科手术护理结果评估计划的报告。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep;25(9):2387-2397. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04875-1. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Surgeon fatigue does not affect surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.外科医生疲劳并不影响手术结果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Today. 2021 May;51(5):659-668. doi: 10.1007/s00595-020-02138-9. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
5
The ALCCaS Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Quality of Life Following Laparoscopic Versus Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer.ALCCaS 试验:腹腔镜与开腹结肠癌根治术治疗结肠癌后生活质量的随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Oct;61(10):1156-1162. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001165.
6
Short- and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: results of a single high-volume center in Japan.机器人辅助腹腔镜直肠癌手术的短期和长期结果:日本一家高手术量中心的结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Dec;33(12):1755-1762. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3153-0. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
7
Operation Start Times and Postoperative Morbidity from Liver Resection: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.肝切除术的手术开始时间与术后发病率:一项倾向评分匹配分析
World J Surg. 2017 Apr;41(4):1100-1109. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3827-0.
8
Comparison of fatigue accumulated during and after prolonged robotic and laparoscopic surgical methods: a cross-sectional study.长时间机器人手术和腹腔镜手术期间及术后累积疲劳的比较:一项横断面研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1119-1135. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5076-6. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
9
Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 清扫术治疗 II/III 期结肠癌的随机对照临床试验的短期手术结果:日本临床肿瘤学组研究 JCOG0404。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jul;260(1):23-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000499.
10
Predictors of conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colorectal cancer and clinical outcomes.腹腔镜辅助结肠癌切除术中转开腹的预测因素及临床结局
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014 Feb;24(1):e21-6. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f6bc0.