Suppr超能文献

早期胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术中双极电凝、超声刀和混合设备围手术期结果的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机研究

Comparison of perioperative outcomes between bipolar sealing, ultrasonic shears and a hybrid device during laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a prospective, multicenter, randomized study.

作者信息

Park Ji-Hyeon, Kong Seong-Ho, Berlth Felix, Choi Jong-Ho, Kim Sara, Kim Sa-Hong, Kang So Hyun, Lee Sangjun, Yoo Jaeun, Goo Eunhee, Jeong Kyoungyun, Kim Hyun Myong, Park Young Suk, Ahn Sang-Hoon, Suh Yun-Suhk, Park Do Joong, Lee Hyuk-Joon, Kim Hyung-Ho, Yang Han-Kwang

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2023 May;26(3):438-450. doi: 10.1007/s10120-023-01365-6. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although EBDs are essential for minimally invasive surgery, well-established prospective randomized studies comparing EBDs are scarce. This study aimed to compare the intraoperative inflammatory response and short-term surgical outcomes among different energy-based devices (EBDs) in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG).

METHODS

Patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer scheduled for LDG at two different medical centers were prospectively randomized into three groups: ultrasonic shears (US), advanced bipolar (BP) and ultrasonic-bipolar hybrid (HB). The C-reactive protein (CRP) level, operation time, intraoperative blood loss (IBL), laboratory tests, cytokines (interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-10), hospital stay, and complication rate were analyzed. A novel semiquantitative measurement method using indocyanine green (ICG) and a near-infrared camera measured the amount of lymphatic leakage.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, the CRP level, was significantly lower in the BP (n = 60) group than in the US (n = 57) or HB (n = 57) group [9.03 ± 5.55 vs. 11.12 ± 5.02 vs. 12.67 ± 6.14, p = 0.001, on postoperative day (POD) 2 and 7.48 vs. 9.62 vs. 9.48, p = 0.026, on POD 4]. IBL was significantly lower in BP than in US or HB (26.3 ± 25.3 vs. 43.7 ± 42.0 vs. 34.9 ± 37.0, p = 0.032). Jackson-Pratt drainage triglycerides were significantly lower in BP than in US (53.6 ± 33.7 vs. 84.2 ± 59.0, p = 0.11; HB: 71.3 ± 51.4). ICG fluorescence intensity, operation time, laboratory results, cytokines, hospital stay, and complication rate were not significantly different among the 3 groups.

CONCLUSION

BP showed a lower postoperative CRP level and less IBL than US and HB, suggesting less collateral thermal damage and better sealing function. Surgeons may consider this when selecting EBDs for laparoscopic surgery.

摘要

背景

尽管能量器械对于微创手术至关重要,但比较能量器械的成熟前瞻性随机研究却很匮乏。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(LDG)中不同能量器械在术中的炎症反应和短期手术结局。

方法

在两个不同医疗中心计划接受LDG的临床I期胃癌患者被前瞻性随机分为三组:超声刀(US)、先进双极电凝(BP)和超声-双极混合电凝(HB)。分析了C反应蛋白(CRP)水平、手术时间、术中失血量(IBL)、实验室检查、细胞因子(白细胞介素(IL)-6和IL-10)、住院时间和并发症发生率。一种使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)和近红外相机的新型半定量测量方法测量了淋巴漏的量。

结果

主要终点CRP水平在BP组(n = 60)中显著低于US组(n = 57)或HB组(n = 57)[术后第2天分别为9.03±5.55 vs. 11.12±5.02 vs. 12.67±6.14,p = 0.001;术后第4天分别为7.48 vs. 9.62 vs. 9.48,p = 0.026]。BP组的IBL显著低于US组或HB组(26.3±25.3 vs. 43.7±42.0 vs. 34.9±37.0,p = 0.032)。BP组的杰克逊-普拉特引流液甘油三酯显著低于US组(53.6±33.7 vs. 84.2±59.0,p = 0.11;HB组为71.3±51.4)。三组间ICG荧光强度、手术时间、实验室结果、细胞因子、住院时间和并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

与US和HB相比,BP术后CRP水平更低,IBL更少,提示其侧方热损伤更小,封闭功能更好。外科医生在为腹腔镜手术选择能量器械时可考虑这一点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验