van den Hoofdakker R H, Beersma D G, Dijk D J
Department of Biological Psychiatry, Academic Hospital (AZ), Groningen, Netherlands.
Acta Psychiatr Belg. 1987 May-Jun;87(3):302-16.
Since the discovery of the antidepressant effects of interventions in the sleep-wake cycle, a number of hypotheses have emerged according to which disturbances in sleep physiology are not merely expressions but essential components of the pathophysiology of depression. Three hypotheses are presented, the "Phase-advance", the "S-deficiency" and the "ACh-hypersensitivity" hypotheses. They explain the therapeutic effects of total, partial and selective sleep deprivation as consequences of the normalization of disturbed sleep regulation. The question is dealt with whether there are indications that the hypothesized sleep regulatory disturbances exist and whether there is a relationship between the effects of sleep deprivation on sleep regulation and clinical state. None of the hypotheses is totally supported, none can be fully rejected.
自从发现干预睡眠-觉醒周期具有抗抑郁作用以来,出现了一些假说,根据这些假说,睡眠生理紊乱不仅是抑郁症病理生理学的表现,而且是其重要组成部分。本文提出了三种假说,即“相位提前”假说、“S缺乏”假说和“乙酰胆碱超敏”假说。它们将完全、部分和选择性睡眠剥夺的治疗效果解释为睡眠调节紊乱正常化的结果。文中探讨了是否有迹象表明存在假定的睡眠调节紊乱,以及睡眠剥夺对睡眠调节的影响与临床状态之间是否存在关联。没有一个假说得到完全支持,也没有一个能被完全否定。